MediaCynic.com

Archives
Homepage
Linking to Us
Recent Headlines




Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator

Add to Pluck





Categories

2008 Election
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Economy
John Edwards
Entertainment
Environment
Al Gore
Health Care
Immigration
International
Iraq
John Kerry
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Plamegate
Politics
Polls
Religion
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Scandals
Science
Social security
Supreme Court
Taxes
Technology






MediaCynic.com Homepage | Taxes

Senate Committee Takes Aim at Offshore Companies

The New York Times reports on Congress' latest target: businessmen who (legally) use offshore companies and bank accounts to lessen or avoid paying U.S. income taxes. The Senate Permanent Investigations Committe, headed Senator Levin, has approved a report which basically takes aim at any offshore transactions done in the Caymen Islands, Nevis, the Isle of Man and Panama.

In a clear indicator that the joy of doing business offshore is about to become a nightmare, the report suggested that the underlying legal assumption that transactions are legal be overturned. Senator Levin said the law "should assume that any transaction in a tax haven is a sham." That would be a sea change in the tax law, if implemented.
So many superrich Americans evade taxes using offshore accounts that law enforcement cannot control the growing misconduct, according to a Senate report that provides the most detailed look ever at high-level tax schemes. Among the billionaires cited in the report are the owner of the New York Jets football team, Robert Wood Johnson IV; the producer of the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" children’s show, Haim Saban; and two Texas businessmen, Charles and Sam Wyly, who the Center for Public Integrity found in 2000 were the ninth-largest contributors to President Bush. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Saban, who are portrayed as victims in the report, are scheduled to testify today before the Senate Permanent Investigations subcommittee. They are expected to say that professional advisers assured them their deals to avoid taxes were more likely lawful than not. The Wyly brothers told the committee that they would invoke their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and thus were not called to testify. The report characterizes them as active participants in tax schemes.

*****

Both Mr. Johnson, the football team owner and scion of the Johnson & Johnson health care fortune, and Mr. Saban, the television mogul, are portrayed in the report as victims. The two men, through representatives, said yesterday that they relied on professional advisers who told them the transactions were lawful, and that they were now settling with the Internal Revenue Service. Mr. Johnson, known as Woody, told Senate investigators two weeks ago that to buy the Jets in 1999 he had to sell assets, incurring the 20 percent tax on long-term capital gains in effect at the time. He said that a way to defer the tax was proposed by Larry B. Scheinfeld, who had been his accountant at KPMG until he joined Quellos, where he worked closely with Chuck Wilk, a tax lawyer.

The technique involved a complex set of circular transactions using what the Senate report characterized as sham corporations in the Isle of Man with shell corporations given names like Jackstones. Their ownership was kept secret.

*****

The report details a scheme created for Mr. Saban to avoid more than $300 million in taxes from sale of his half interest in the Family Channel and related properties. Mr. Saban told Senate investigators that he never understood the transactions but undertook them after asking two questions of Mr. Wilk and his personal tax lawyer, Matthew Krane. Mr. Saban said he asked whether the deals were legal and whether a major law firm would certify them as proper. The two lawyers, Mr. Saban said, answered "yes to both," so he went ahead.
So, what's this really all about? It's about a government that has a huge deficit because of the war in Iraq. When the deficit gets this big, Congress starts looking for targets. The new target is going to be any business person who sets up a company in an offshore tax haven, or uses those havens to (legally) avoid taxes. Because, if the Committee has its way, then the new rule will be "If you do business off shore, you're a crook. And you're going to spend millions of dollars defending yourself to the IRS, no matter how many law firms and accountants told you it was legal."

As the war in Iraq becomes more and more expensive, as oil becomes more expensive and the deficit grows ever larger, Congress will target more and more transactions and industries that -- if audited -- could possibly turn up some revenue for the ailing U.S. treasury.

Posted on August 1, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Bush's New Twist on Social Security: Cut Benefits for the Middle Class

Well, that was a bit of an eye-opener. Last night, President Bush announced the fuzzy outlines of his plans to revamp social security. He doesn't have all the kinks worked out yet, but here are the linchpins of the plan: 1) tie benefits to prices (that is, inflation), not wages, which would produce a hefty cut in guaranteed benefits over time, 2) reduce benefits for the middle class and so-called wealthy Americans "to help the poor", and --you guessed it-- 3)private savings accounts coupled with yet more reductions in guaranteed benefits. It's certainly a novel approach. Cut benefits for the middle class; you know, the majority of Americans, those people who actually vote in elections. As Frank Newport of Gallup said, the more Bush talks about social security the more his poll numbers drop. But those in the echo chamber don't seem to hear what Americans are saying.

Posted on April 29, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Supreme Court Protects IRA's

In a piece of good news this morning, the Supreme Court has ruled that IRA's are protected from creditors in bankruptcy proceedings.
The unanimous decision sides with a bankrupt Arkansas couple fighting to keep more than $55,000 in retirement savings. As a result, IRAs now join pensions, 401(k)s, Social Security and other benefits tied to age, illness or disability that are afforded protection under bankruptcy law.
Oh, but wait: there's a spoiler.
Under bankruptcy law, the retirement savings won't be given blanket protection. A separate provision in the law shields the assets only to the extent the money is "reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent."
And who decides whether the money is "reasonably necessary"? Well, it used to be the bankruptcy judge, but under the new bankruptcy law, look for creditors to argue that IRA money isn't necessary for the 1.6 million people who filed for personal bankruptcy last year. And who are these profligate spenders filing bankruptcy anyway? "Experts say much of that is being driven by people 55 and older who lose their jobs and cannot pay off debts."

Posted on April 4, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

Bush Dangerously Close to the Read My Lips Zone

President George W. Bush is dangerously close to entering the Read My Lips: No New Taxes territory that sunk his father's hopes of a second term as president. Bush, Jr. knew that the only way he could get small and medium-sized businesses on board with this social security privatization idea is to promise not to increase the taxes paid by businesses to social security. He said over and over again he would consider any fix but a tax hike. But, here we go again. The Associated Press reports that President Bush is, indeed, open to the idea of raising social security and/or medicare taxes. That set off a firestorm among fiscal conservatives (You remember them, right? Small government, no deficits, fiscal responsibility? No? Me either.) "People are quite angry about Bush opening a Pandora's box of tax increases," said Stephen Moore, an anti-tax advocate from the Club for Growth. "It's almost like 'read my lips' all over again." Be careful, Mr. Moore, you are treading dangerously close to heresy here. That almost sounds like you're calling our president a flip-flopper.

Posted on February 18, 2005
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Our Blogs

Bloggers Blog
Book Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog


Text Ads




www.mediacynic.com
Copyright © 2003-2007 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.