MediaCynic.com

Homepage
Politics Twitter
Recent Headlines



Categories

2008 Election
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Economy
John Edwards
Entertainment
Environment
Al Gore
Health Care
Immigration
International
Iraq
John Kerry
John McCain
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Barack Obama
Sarah Palin
Plamegate
Politics
Polls
Religion
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Scandals
Science
Social security
Supreme Court
Taxes
Technology



MediaCynic.com Homepage | Media

How the Media Viewed Obama's First 100 Days

President Obama recently hit the important milestone of having been president for 100 days. So how did the media cover this event? Well, Fox News saw it as the Apocalypse, MSNBC worshipped all things Obama and CNN totally geeked out. Jon Stewart explains:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c
Obama 101
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Economic CrisisFirst 100 Days


Posted on May 1, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |



Jon Stewart vs. Jim Cramer

Jon Stewart has been taking on the guys over at CNBC; his latest target is the excitable Jim Cramer. Cramer complained that Stewart mischaracterized his remarks, then claimed that he never told his viewers to buy Bear Stearns stock right before it crashed. Stewart did some research and well, you probably know how this one's going to turn out. Take a look:



Posted on March 10, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |



Saturday Night Live: Michael Steele is Limbaugh-Approved

Every time a Republican criticizes Rush Limbaugh, he then has to retract his statement, grovel and then hold a press conference to say that he and Rush have patched things up. Last night Saturday Night Live did a skit in which RNC chair Michael Steele is electrically shocked every time he says something that's not Limbaugh-approved. Take a look:



Posted on March 8, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Dr. Sanjay Gupta Won't Take Surgeon General Job

Dr Sanjay GuptaDr. Sanjay Gupta has decided not to take President Obama's Surgeon General offer. He didn't want to have to give up practicing neurosurgery especially with a third child on the way.
"This is more about my family and my surgical career," Gupta told CNN's "Larry King Live."

The neurosurgeon said he would likely have had to give up practicing had he taken the job as the nation's top doctor.

In addition, the 39-year-old and his wife are expecting their third daughter any time, and the government job would have meant long periods away from his family, he said.

"I think, for me, it really came down to a sense of timing more than anything else," he said. "I just didn't feel I should do that now."
It's too bad because he would have been really good at it. He has both the knowledge base and the communication skills.

Posted on March 6, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Governor Jindal Angers Alaskans by Calling Volcano Monitoring Wasteful Spending

The Anchorage Daily News reports that Alaskans are angry that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (GOP) singled out "volcano monitoring" as wasteful spending during his response to President Obama's speech Tuesday night.
Jindal singled out "volcano monitoring" as an unnecessary frill that Democrats stuck in the recently adopted stimulus package.

"Their legislation is larded with wasteful spending," Jindal said. "It includes ... $140 million for something called 'volcano monitoring.' Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C."

Jindal's comments provoked an eruption of their own. Alaska politicians, liberal bloggers and some scientists began pointing out how useful it is to let people know when a volcano in their neighborhood is about to explode.

"Volcano monitoring is a matter of life and death in Alaska," Democratic Sen. Mark Begich said in an open letter to Jindal.
Jindal should have looked at his speech a lot more carefully. It should be fairly obvious that volcano monitoring is important for some states just like hurricane monitoring is important in Jindal's state. In Alaska, scientists are currently keeping a close eye on Mount Redoubt which could still erupt soon.

Posted on February 26, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |



Rupert Murdoch Apologizes For Chimp Cartoon

New York Post publisher and media mogul Rupert Murdoch published a rare apology yesterday about a controversail New York Post cartoon. The cartoon shows a violent chimp being shot dead by police. Critics argue that the cartoonists is portraying the chimp in the cartoon as President Barack Obama because one of the police officers in the cartoon says of the dead chimp, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill." Al Sharpton says Murdoch's apology is not enough.



Posted on February 25, 2009
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Hall and Oates' Tribute to Alan Colmes

Alan Colmes is leaving Hannity and Colmes for reasons that have yet to be satisfactorily explained. Hannity will go it alone for now. Jon Stewart invited Daryl Hall and John Oates to commemorate the event. Take a look:



Posted on December 12, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Is MSNBC the New Fox News?

Jon Stewart wants to know who will take over for Fox News as the official tv station of the current administration. The answer: MSNBC. The parallels are striking. Take a look:



Posted on December 2, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |



Alec Baldwin Defends Palin's SNL Appearance

Alec Baldwin wrote a blog post critical of those who think Sarah Palin should not have been allowed to appear on Saturday Night Live. Baldwin appeared in the skit with Governor Palin on SNL.
Saturday Night Live is a comedy show. It's not Meet the Press. It doesn't "ask the tough questions" or "set the agenda." It attempts, with varying degrees of success, to make people laugh. That's it. Whether they skewer and savage people in order to do so, they don't care. When you come on a show like that, you are prepared in advance to get worked over. Palin knew that. Palin came on to be a good sport. And she was. She was polite, gracious. (More so than some of the famous actors who come through there, believe me.)

However, I assume that, like Meet the Press, SNL feels an obligation to offer their special forum to any and all public figures and officials who are current. Headline making. And in SNL's case, would make for a hit show. Several people decried SNL for giving her a spot on the show. You're kidding, right? The woman is the Vice Presidential nominee of one of the two major parties in this country. Don't put her on SNL? With all of her exposure and the Tina Fey performance? What reality are you in?

If you think an appearance on Saturday Night Live would sway voters and actually affect the outcome of the election, you may have more contempt for the electorate of this country than the Republican National Committee does. And that's a lot of contempt.
It would have been very unfair and awkward if Sarah Palin had been barred from SNL especially after all of Tina Fey's funny skits. If you haven't already seen the two Sarah Palin skits from Saturday night you can watch them here and here.

Posted on October 20, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

No Love Lost Between Matthews and Olbermann

One of the odd things during the convention coverage has been the increasing hostility that the MSNBC anchors are showing towards each other. The wheels are really coming off at the news station. I knew Olbermann and Matthews had their differences, but this is really getting ridiculous. Jon Stewart has the report:



Posted on August 28, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Vanity Fair Spoofs New Yorker Spoof

Photo of Vanity Fair McCain Cover


Vanity Fair decided to create a cover in response to the infamous New Yorker Obama cover. It depicts John and Cindy McCain doing the fist bump in the oval office. The constitution burns in the fire place, George Bush's portrait is on the wall and McCain is using a walker. Cindy is holding a bunch of prescription pill bottles. It sounds shocking, but somehow the execution is kind of boring.

Posted on July 22, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Jon Stewart on New Yorker Cover: It's Just a $%@!! Cartoon

Jon Stewart gives his take on the New Yorker cover which purports to satirize the far right's view of Barack Obama and his wife. Stewart says: "It's just a [expletive] cartoon!" He also says that the better response from the Obama camp would have been: "It's just a cartoon and the only people who get up in arms about cartoons are extremist Muslims, which Barack is not." He has a point. Take a look:



Posted on July 16, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Tim Russert is Dead of a Heart Attack

Tim Russert has died of a massive heart attack today. Tim Brokaw broke the sad news on MSNBC today.



Posted on June 13, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Breaking News: Obama Wears Jeans

Chris Matthews gets a thrill running up his leg when Barack Obama speaks. But these reporters on Obama's press plane really take the "I've Got a Crush on Obama" syndrome to a whole new low. CNN had this breaking news video to announce that Barack Obama decided to wear jeans. The reporters ooh and ahh and leer at the candidate, yelling at another passenger to sit down and get out of the way of their oglefest, as Obama strikes a wide-stanced pose for them. It's absolutely nauseating.



(Hat tip: Michelle Malkin.).

Posted on May 9, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

The Media's Crush on Obama, Put in Perspective

Joe Scarborough and Tucker Carlson have a scathing discussion about the crush that most of the news media has on Barack Obama. It's funny and it's dead on accurate.



Posted on May 8, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Chris Matthews Dances With Ellen

Here's a video clip demonstrating the dancing skills of various MSNBC hosts. You may recall that Tucker Carlson had a brief stint on Dancing With the Stars: alas, Joe Scarborough is still waiting for his callback from his amazing audition tape. But the dancer who really stands out is Chris Matthews, who nearly strangled poor Ellen DeGeneres with his enthusiastic dancing style. Warning: watching Chris Matthew cutting a rug is not for the faint of heart.



Posted on March 20, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Clinton Press Corps Banished to Men's Room

Last night Hillary Clinton was in Austin, Texas for a "Texas sized townhall" and the traveling press corps had to be put somewhere. So the Clinton campaign found a space in the Burger Activity Center that could house them all: the men's locker room. But the campaign didn't know beforehand that there were actually urinals in the room. The press set up their laptops after discovering that the space did, at least, have Wi-Fi access. When the reality of the space was conveyed to the Clinton campaign, spokesman Doug Hattaway quipped: "These accommodations should in no way be taken as a comment on the quality of our media coverage." Ha!



Posted on March 4, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Associated Press Reporter Argues With Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney was giving a press conference inside a Staples store in South Carolina when an exchange between him and AP reporter Glen Johnson became heated.
Romney was in the middle of answering a routine question when he said something that caused Associated Press reporter Glen Johnson to lose his temper.

"I don't have lobbyists running my campaign," Romney said. "I don't have lobbyists that are tied to my ..."

"That's not true, governor!" Johnson suddenly interjected. "That is not true. Ron Kaufman is a lobbyist."
CBS News says Kaufman is a "well-known lobbyist, former adviser to President H.W. Bush and Romney campaign adviser who is often seen by the governor's side while on the road."

Kaufman may be a lobbyist but he isn't running the campaign according to Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney also said Kaufman is not in on the "senior strategy meetings" of Romney's campaigns. MSNBC also blogged the exchanged.
Romney went on, "Did you hear what I said? Did you hear what I said, Glen? I said I don't have lobbyists running my campaign, and he's not running my campaign." Johnson then shot back, "He's a senior adviser."

Romney charged on with: "He's an adviser. And the person who runs my campaign is Beth Myers, and I have a whole staff of deputy campaign managers," prompting Johnson to ask if Myers traveled on the plane with him, and he said she had.

It's also worth noting that Barbara Comstock, another senior adviser, is a Washington lobbyist.
Mitt Romney also explained that he didn't spend all this money and energy campaigning just to help out lobbyists. Romney said, "Somebody doesn't put the kind of financial resources that I've put into this campaign and the personal resources I've put into this campaign in order to do favors for lobbyists. I'm going to Washington to help the American people and that's what this campaign is all about."

You can see a video clip of the unusual exchange here on CBS News. At the end of the clip a woman who says she is not with Romney campaign tells Glen Johnson she thinks he is "rude and ugly."

Glen Johnson allowed himself to get emotionally involved in the story he was covering and that's a mistake. When a journalist becomes the center of a story he has lost his objectivity.

Posted on January 17, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

John Stewart on the Race Issue

John Stewart on the Daily Show pokes fun at the media for accusing the candidates of playing the "race card." Stewart also looks back at the comment from Hillary Clinton about Martin Luther King and President Lyndon Johnson that supposedly stirred things up and finds nothing inflammatory.



Posted on January 16, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Lou Dobbs Criticizes Poll-Obsessed Media on The Daily Show

CNN anchor Lou Dobbs apologizes on The Daily Show for CNN getting the New Hampshire caucus results wrong. Dobbs also takes the media to task over exit polling and for prematurely inaugurating Barack Obama. Jon Stewart also runs a clip from Loud Dobbs' show where he polled his audience to see if they were tired of the media talking about candidates' charisma and likability instead of focusing on the important issues.



Posted on January 13, 2008
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert to Return to the Airwaves

Jon Stewart (The Daily Show and Stephen Colbert (The Colbert Report) will return the airwaves on January 7, 2008. But there's a catch: they won't have any of their comedy writers, because of the writers' strike.
After a previously scheduled two-week hiatus, "The Daily Show With Jon Stewart" and "The Colbert Report" will resume production Jan. 7, Comedy Central said in a statement released late Thursday afternoon. "We continue to hold out hope for a swift resolution to the current stalemate that will enable the shows to be complete again," the network said.

Stewart and Colbert said they wished they could return to work with their writers. "If we cannot, we would like to express our ambivalence, but without our writers we are unable to express something as nuanced as ambivalence," the comedians said in a statement.

The decision by the Comedy Central hosts, whose programs have been in reruns since the film and TV writers went on strike Nov. 5, follow announcements by Jay Leno, Conan O'Brien and Jimmy Kimmel this week that they would go back on the air in January, even if they had to cross a picket line. NBC's Carson Daly returned to the air this month. In contrast with prime-time scripted series that rely on writers, the late-night hosts can theoretically improvise and fill the time with celebrity interviews and musical guests.
Jay Leno, Jimmy Kimmel and Conan O'Brien are also returning to the airwaves in early January, also without writers. David Letterman, who owns his own production company Worldwide Pants is currently in talks with the Writers Guild to get an exemption so he can use his writers. None of the other comedians own their own shows, so cannot negotiate directly with the WGA.

One strange result of the writers' strike is that the public has been seeing the presidential campaigning without the nightly commentary by comedians. With the comedians back, expect to see much more pointed criticism of all the candidates. That is, if they can improvise enough jokes to make a monologue. It's going to be very interesting to see how they fare.

Posted on December 21, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Vladimir Putin is Time's Person of the Year

Time Magazine has chosen Vladimir Putin as its Person of the Year. Here's what the editors had to say about their selection:
TIME's Person of the Year is not and never has been an honor. It is not an endorsement. It is not a popularity contest. At its best, it is a clear-eyed recognition of the world as it is and of the most powerful individuals and forces shaping that world-for better or for worse. It is ultimately about leadership-bold, earth-changing leadership.

Putin is not a boy scout. He is not a democrat in any way that the West would define it. He is not a paragon of free speech. He stands, above all, for stability-stability before freedom, stability before choice, stability in a country that has hardly seen it for a hundred years. Whether he becomes more like the man for whom his grandfather prepared blinis -- who himself was twice TIME's Person of the Year-or like Peter the Great, the historical figure he most admires; whether he proves to be a reformer or an autocrat who takes Russia back to an era of repression-this we will know only over the next decade. At significant cost to the principles and ideas that free nations prize, he has performed an extraordinary feat of leadership in imposing stability on a nation that has rarely known it and brought Russia back to the table of world power. For that reason, Vladimir Putin is TIME's 2007 Person of the Year.
The runners up were: Al Gore, J.K. Rowling, Hu Jintao and David Petraeus.

Posted on December 19, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Studios Making a Big Mistake In Writers' Strike Negotiating Tactics

The AMPTP (Association of Motion Picture and Television Producers) walked out on the negotiations with the WGA (Writers' Guild) last Friday after issuing a remarkably petulant ultimatum: that the writers pull off the table their demand for jurisdiction over reality television and animation. The WGA refused to negotiate against itself but said it would be happy to keep talking. The AMPTP walked out in a huff.

The PR firm hired by the AMPTP has really misjudged this strike situation. Never in the history of Hollywood has there been such support for the writers who create everyone's favorite scripted programs: from Heroes to Lost to Gray's Anatomy, fans now know who creates those shows because they watch them on podcasts. Fans are participating in the strike by marching in picket lines, mailing in pencils to the studios as a protest and by visiting the very funny new websites created by the bored, out of work writers of the David Letterman Show.

The AMPTP is already starting to feel the pinch of the strike, major networks are having to compensate advertisers with additional hours of ads or -- in NBC's case -- having to give back actual cash because the network has essentially run out of episodes of popular scripted programming. The WGA leadership isn't going to cave, and neither is the rank and file writers who know that if they don't get a contract in which they are paid residuals for new media, that they won't be paid anything at all when most programming goes online in the future. It's time for the AMPTP to come back to the table and realize that times have changed. Writers must be paid for new media.

Posted on December 12, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

Writers Write, Inc. Launches Fantasy and Science Fiction Blog

Writers Write, Inc. has added a new blog to its blog network called FantasySFBlog.com. Fantasy/SF Blog is a daily blog covering what's new and interesting in the worlds of fantasy, SF, and horror, including books, movies, TV and gaming.

Recent posts include:

  • Lost: The Orchid Orientation Video
  • Is Peter Jackson Back on Board for The Hobbit?
  • Finalists Announced For British Fantasy Awards
  • Saw IV Coming in October
  • Will Tom Cruise Join the Star Trek Cast?
  • The Dresden Files Is Cancelled
  • ABC Offers Masters of Science Fiction
  • The Beowulf Trailer is Here
  • Johnny Depp Is Barnabas Collins

    RSS subscription informaton for the Fantasy/SF Blog can be found here.

    Posted on August 15, 2007
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

  • Mikhail Gorbachev and His Louis Vuitton Luggage

    Photo of Gorbachov in Louis Vuitton ad


    No, your eyes are not deceiving you: that really is the last Mikhail S. Gorbachev, the last president of the Soviet Union starring in a new ad for French luxury luggage and handbag maker, Louis Vuitton. So what in the world is Mikhail doing in a Louis Vuitton ad, in which we usually see actress Scarlett Johannson in a skimpy outfit? The New York Times explains the concept.
    That said, what is a reader to make of a Vuitton ad, coming in the big September books, that stars Mikhail S. Gorbachev, the last president of the Soviet Union? A decade ago, Mr. Gorbachev's appearance in a Pizza Hut commercial was generally greeted as a low point in his career.

    The Vuitton ad, however, is part of a campaign to emphasize the company's heritage in luggage and travel accessories. Photographed by Annie Leibovitz, the ads include other celebrities using Vuitton bags: Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf cuddling in a hotel room, their bags not yet unpacked; Catherine Deneuve resting on a trunk in front of a steaming locomotive; and Mr. Gorbachev in the back of a car with a duffel bag on the seat next to him. Of the group, Mr. Gorbachev appears the least comfortable. He is holding on to a door handle, as if the bag contained polonium 210.

    It seems unlikely he will be approached by L'Oreal.
    When he's not posing for fashion photographers, Gorby has been busy blasting the U.S.' "obsession with winning," which is destroying the world. Perhaps this quote has lost something in translation, because it doesn't seem like we've been "winning" much of anything lately. Certainly we're not winning the Iraq War, and the battle for hearts and minds desperately needs a new strategy.

    Posted on July 27, 2007
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth Takes Home Best Documentary Oscar

    Photo of Al Gore at 2007 OscarsAn Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore's documentary about global warming, won the Oscar for Best Documentary last night. It was a well-deserved honor. Gore (pictured with producer Davis Guggenheim), said that the issue of global warming is not a Republican or Democratic issue, or even a political issue: that it is a moral issue.

    Earlier in the broadcast, Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio appeared onstage in a very funny bit spoofing some pundits' speculation that Gore would use his Oscar speech to announce he was running for president of the United States. After DiCaprio asked Gore if there was anything he wanted to announce tonight, Gore pulled out a prepared speech and began reading "My Fellow Americans, tonight..." when the orchestra began playing loudly, indicating that his time was up. Gore seemed relaxed and natural and his acceptance speech was gracious. So, no announcement from Al yet. But there's still plenty of time to throw his hat into the ring.

    Posted on February 26, 2007
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Keith Olbermann: Bush, Not Kerry, Owes Troops an Apology

    Keith Olbermann puts the Kerry speech and the right wing's unhinged response to it into historical perspective in this excellent clip from his show on MSBNC.
    Olbermann really is channeling Edward R. Murrow these days. He -- along with a few others -- has both really hit his stride during the Bush Administration.

    Posted on November 2, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Censoring Differing Opinions

    Wonkette reports that it is being blocked from being read by Marines on active duty in Iraq.
    We realize that when it comes to freedom of the press, the USA has fallen to Number 53 in the world — tied with our fascist homies in Croatia and the islanders of the Kingdom of Tonga! — but do we have to make is so damned obvious?

    Another Marine stationed in Iraq has sent us a screenshot of what happens when you need some hot news on Macaca and Foley: "forbidden, this page (http://www.wonkette.com) is categorized as (Personal Pages) ALL SITES YOU VISIT ARE LOGGED AND FILED."

    Nice little threat at the end, too. Asswipes. Notice the other browser tabs. Two actual "personal pages" that rah-rah for Bush (What's her name, the wannabe Coulter, and Hugh Hewitt) show up just fine, as our Marine Operative confirms. But "Talking Points Memo," which is apparently one of the "left leaning" sites one hears so much about these days, is prohibited.

    Writes the Corporal: "I think that this kind of censoring is a big deal. I can understand blocking porn, music and movies, and blatantly illegal sites, but blocking sites that some higher up just doesn't agree with is disgusting. They are blocking a huge portion of voters from information that will help them determine which side to vote for. Because of this, the only news we get is from the big corporations or conservative based sites."
    That's not all the military is blocking. Soldiers who blog are being closely monitored and even being shut down. Soldiers can get to Fox News, convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy's show and to that blowhard Rush Limbaugh's site, but they aren't allowed to read humor on Wonkette, or political opinions on Talking Points Memo, DailyKos or the Al Franken Show website.

    Soldiers are dying everyday in Iraq for their country and they can only read rabid, extreme, right-wing websites. No moderate, no liberal, libertarian or left-leaning thoughts are allowed. Because we certainly wouldn't want our citizens in the armed forces to be exposed to any pesky facts or conflicting political opinions, now would we?

    Posted on October 26, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Writers Write, Inc. Launches VideoNacho.com

    Writers Write, Inc. announces the launch of VideoNacho.com. VideoNacho.com features the Web's hottest short videos and film clips. Video Nacho's editors find the best videos on the Web so you don't have to: music, comedy, pets antics, social commentary: it just has to be entertaining. Enjoy a delicious short new video snack every afternoon. Calorie-free, it's sure to give you a lift!

    VideoNacho.com is the twentieth blog to join the Writers Write Lifestyle Network. It follows the launch in May, 2006 of WatchersWatch.com, a blog covering what's hot in movies and television.

    Posted on October 18, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Toshiba's Exciting New Concept of Television Viewing

    Photo of Toshiba 360 degree viewing deviceElectronics giant Toshiba has created a new viewing device that allows the wearer to experience television in a full 360-degree view.

    I'm all for the advancements in television and film viewing and this device appears to have an added benefit: there appears to be no way to snack during movies. Think of all the calories you'll save! And with no way to sit back and relax, think of how improved your posture will be after watching a movie. And, of course, it clearly keeps you from having to make small talk with your movie companions.

    Seriously though, have the Toshiba execs lost their minds? Think smaller and more comfortable. Then they might have something.

    Posted on October 16, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Congressman Foley Resigns in Disgrace

    Florida Republican congressman Mark Foley resigned in disgrace yesterday after ABC news got copies of the emails and instant messages that Foley sent to a 16 year-old male page. The instant messages are x-rated and are particularly revolting in light of the fact that Foley was a national leader on the issue of protecting children from sexual predators. He was the co-chairman of the Congressional Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus.

    Republican leaders are very unhappy with the incident which took over the news cycle on the last day that Congress is in session.
    The top three Republicans in the House assailed Rep. Mark Foley Saturday over his e-mails to a teenage male page and said his resignation was not enough. Calling the incident "an obscene breach of trust," the congressmen released a statement saying, "[Foley's] immediate resignation must now be followed by the full weight of the criminal justice system."

    "The improper communications between Congressman Mark Foley and former House congressional pages is unacceptable and abhorrent. It is an obscene breach of trust," read the statement issued by Majority Leader John Boehner of Ohio, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois, and Majority Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri. Earlier Saturday, the chairman of the House Page Board said Foley "was not honest about his conduct," referring to e-mail exchanges that a former page has called "sick, sick, sick."

    The House leaders said in their statement that they had asked the House Page Board to review the incident and to propose measures to ensure the program is safe. They also have set up a toll-free number for pages and their relatives to confidentially report incidents, the statement said. After the e-mails were publicized, ABC News released instant text messages allegedly sent by the congressman to other teenage male pages. In them Foley allegedly said he wanted to take the teen's clothes off and allegedly asked the page if he made him "a little horny," ABC News reported, saying other exchanges were too graphic to make public. Foley, a Republican, served his district in Florida for six terms. He abruptly resigned from Congress on Friday, apologizing "for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent." The House voted unanimously Friday to launch an investigation
    Hastert's outrage rings a bit false, considering that he and the Republican leadership knew all about Foley's proclivities a year ago and worked hard to cover it up. According to The New York Times:
    Top House Republicans knew for months about e-mail traffic between Representative Mark Foley and a former teenage page, but kept the matter secret and allowed Mr. Foley to remain head of a Congressional caucus on children’s issues, Republican lawmakers said Saturday.

    *****

    The revelations set off a political upheaval, with Democrats and some Republicans alike calling for a full investigation of Mr. Foley’s conduct and whether House leaders did enough to look into it. Members of the Republican leadership sought Saturday to detail how they had handled the case in an effort to defuse the issue, even as it was emerging as an issue in Congressional races.

    Among those who earlier this year became aware of the fall 2005 communications between Mr. Foley and the 16-year-old page, who worked for Representative Rodney Alexander, Republican of Louisiana, were Representative John A. Boehner, the majority leader, and Representative Thomas M. Reynolds of New York, chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. Mr. Reynolds said in a statement Saturday that he had also personally raised the issue with Speaker J. Dennis Hastert.

    *****

    Representative Christopher Shays, Republican of Connecticut, said any leader who had been aware of Mr. Foley’s behavior and failed to take action should step down. "If they knew or should have known the extent of this problem, they should not serve in leadership," Mr. Shays said.
    So the Republican leadership knew that this creep was hitting on teenagers and kept it quiet for almost a year. They didn't launch an investigation, they didn't confront Foley and they didn't warn the parents who had entrusted their children to the page system. That is simply despicable.

    It's not October, but it's certainly a Surprise to voters. Somehow, I don't think this is what Karl Rove was referring to when he promised there would be an "October Surprise." Oh, and if you simply must read Congressman Foley's pathetic and creepy instant messages, ABC has thoughtfully provided all the smut in a pdf file. Warning: includes explicit material.

    Posted on September 30, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Newsweek to American Public: You Can't Handle the Truth

    Photo of Newsweek Afghanistan coversIn a striking display of cynicism, condescension or something else entirely Newsweek decided that the American people can't handle the truth about Afghanistan: that the Taliban is taking over again. The Newsweek covers for Asia, Europe and Latin America show a fierce looking young man pointing a rocket-propelled grenade launcher at the reader, while the headline blares "Losing Afghanistan." The story inside details how the Taliban is slowly taking over as the U.S. backed government falls apart.
    In Ghazni and in six provinces to the south, and in other hot spots to the east, Karzai's government barely exists outside district towns. Hard-core Taliban forces have filled the void by infiltrating from the relatively lawless tribal areas of Pakistan where they had fled at the end of 2001. Once back inside Afghanistan these committed jihadist commanders and fighters, aided by key sympathizers who had remained behind, have raised hundreds, if not thousands, of new, local recruits, many for pay. They feed on the people's disillusion with the lack of economic progress, equity and stability that Karzai's government, NATO, Washington and the international community had promised.

    NATO officials say the Taliban seems to be flush with cash, thanks to the guerrillas' alliance with prosperous opium traffickers. The fighters are paid more than $5 a day - good money in Afghanistan, and at least twice what the new Afghan National Army's 30,000 soldiers receive. It's a bad sign, too, that a shortage of local police has led Karzai to approve a plan allowing local warlords - often traffickers themselves - to rebuild their private armies. U.N. officials have spent the past three years trying to disband Afghanistan's irregular militias, which are accused of widespread human-rights abuses. Now the warlords can rearm with the government's blessing. Afghanistan is "unfortunately well on its way" to becoming a "narco-state," NATO's supreme commander, Marine Gen. Jim Jones, said before Congress last week.

    Jabar Shilghari, one of Ghazni's members of Parliament, is appalled by his province's rapid reversal of fortune. Only a year ago he was freely stumping for votes throughout the province. Today it's not safe for him to return to his own village. In a recent meeting he asked Karzai for more police and soldiers; he was rebuffed by the deputy director of intelligence, who told him the Taliban threat in Ghazni is minimal. "We have patiently waited five years for change, for an end to official corruption and abuse of power and for economic development," says Shilghari, who now lives in the increasingly sequestered capital of Kabul. "But we've received nothing."
    A recent piece by Anderson Cooper on CNN showed how the poppy business is booming in Afghanistan. 90% of the world's heroin comes from the poppy fields of Afghanistan. Yet the U.S.-backed government won't destroy the poppy fields (which would be quite easy) and put the farmers to work growing another, legal, crop that could replace the income lost from the poppy fields. Corruption is rampant said the police who were interviewed on camera for the piece, and the higher-ups are paid off by the drug lords. The poppy problem is just one aspect of the failed war in Afghanistan.

    These facts are being kept from the American people. Instead, Newsweek runs a puff piece on celebrity photographer Annie Lebovtiz. Yes, she's incredibly talented as a photographer, but that's not the point. Newsweek clearly thinks Americans are too dumb to understand serious foreign policy articles, or someone put the word out that having an Islamic extremist on the cover with the words "Losing Afghanistan" would not be appreciated by certain people in the run-up to the mid-term elections.

    Posted on September 28, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Documenting the Lies in the ABC Propaganda Film:The Path to 9/11

    A New Zealand blogger who has already seen the nauseating propaganda film being shown on ABC tonight in the U.S. called The Path to 9/11 and has documented the most egregious falshoods in the film. He has videoclips of each scene that distorts the truth and then explains what is false about the scene. In one scene, our forces have bin Laden in their sights. Sandy Berger, the National Security Advisor, refuses to give the order to fire because he's scared he'll be blamed if it all goes wrong. According to the 9/11 commission and Sandy Berger, this event never happened; it is a fantasy by the film makers.

    Madeleine Albright (whose name isn't even spelled correctly in the film) is libeled in the film and reportedly is furious over her portrayal. The film incorrectly blames her character for warning the Pakastanis that we were firing missiles into Pakistan to get Osama bin Laden. The Pakistanis then informed bin Laden and he got away. This scene is inaccurate. Everyone agreed that we had to warn Pakistan that missiles were coming into the country; otherwise they would think it was a first strike by India and it might have led to nuclear war. The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs was responsible for the notification (not Madeleine Albright) and he did not inform Pakistan until after the missiles were in the air.

    It has now come out that the lies in this film upset a number of the actors in the film who are speaking out. Harvey Keitel had the 9/11 Commission Report on the set and disputed the facts in the script, mostly to no avail. According to the New York Post there were no experts on the set of the film whatsoever. The only consultant was an ex-CIA employee who looked at the graphics to make sure they looked right. That was it.

    After watching all the video clips, I was struck by how ridiculous a lot of the dialogue is. It has quite a hysterical tone to it. But that's not surprising, considering the writer/director is a leader in an extreme right wing evangelical network. The financing for the film also came from extremist sources which want a theocracy in the United States. Basically, they're Swift Boat-ing Bill Clinton and his cabinet.

    A film that covers such a serious historical event must be factually accurate. For ABC to run such a film m (which it intends to send to public schools across the United States) is outrageous and morally reprehensible. The film claims to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report, which it is not. In fact, the 9/11 Report totally contradicts many of the facts, assumptions and assertions in the film. Former President Bill Clinton had his attorneys send a letter to the president of ABC demanding that the the film not be shown unless the blatant inaccuracies are first corrected, saying "Do the right thing for the country and pull this despicable work of fiction from the air.... Airing something that is incontrovertibly incorrect at a time like this is inexcusable."

    I couldn't agree more.

    Posted on September 10, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Katie Couric Shines in Her News Debut

    Photo of Katie CouricKatie Couric made television history tonight by being the first female to anchor a major network nightly news program. She knocked it out of the park.

    The show began with Walter Cronkite doing the voiceover introducing Couric. Couric made a brief hello and went right into a hard-hitting piece on how Afghanistan is falling apart and how the Taliban is back. She interviewed Thomas Friedman about how the Iraq War is going (not good) and she even broke the hottest celebrity story going: she showed the first photos of Suri Cruise from the new Vanity Fair suit. In another breakthrough, the newscast was simulcast online: it's free, but you have to fill out a short registration form. The newscast can be watched, on demand, during the show, or anytime after. I watched it in on the simulcast and the picture was perfect. This is miles ahead of what any other news station is doing and is clearly the future for major news broadcasts.

    Regular features include one about consumers and their money; tonight offered a tour of the new oil rig platform which is drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico (it will take more than a year of drilling to confirm the value of the major new find). A new Free Speech segment will give voice to everyone from Rush Limbaugh (Thursday) to former President Bush. Morgan Spurlock took the first spot talking about how America isn't nearly as divided on issues as the media makes it out to be. Rush Limbaugh said that George Clooney has already asked for equal time to refute everything that Rush will say. The segments run from 30 seconds to 1 minute and 30 seconds, and there will be no rebuttal on the same night. On Friday night, a comedian will take the spot. Let's hope Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert agree to stop by.

    Katie's voice was measured and melodious, she looked great and, most importantly, she sounded serious. She was good, very good indeed.

    Posted on September 5, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Kyra Phillips' Top Ten Excuses

    Photo of Kyra Phillips on David Letterman Poor Kyra Phillips! The personable CNN anchor had the worst week of her life: on Tuesday during President Bush's speech from New Orleans, Kyra went to the ladies room and forgot to turn off her wireless microphone. Millions of viewers listened in to Kyra's personal conversation about her husband and family, which could be heard while Bush was still talking. Kyra talked about how great her husband is, but did lament that her sister in law was such a "control freak" and how she felt her brother needed protecting. Someone finally told Kyra her mic was on and the unintended broadcast from the CNN ladies room ended. CNN apologized as did Krya.

    Showing that she has the ability to poke fun at herself, Kyra agreed to go on the David Letterman show to read the Top Ten.
    Top Ten Kyra Phillips Excuses Presented by CNN Anchor Kyra Phillips:

    10. "Still haven't mastered complicated On/Off switch."

    9. "Larry King told me he does this all the time."

    8. "How was I supposed to know we had a reporter embedded in the bathroom?"

    7. "I honestly never knew this sort of thing was frowned upon."

    6. "Couldn't resist chance to win $10,000 on America's Funniest Home Videos.

    5. "I was set up by those bastards at Fox News."

    4. "Oh, like you've never gone to the bathroom and had it broadcast on national television!"

    3. "I just wanted that hunky Lou Dobbs to notice me."

    2. "OK, so I was drunk and couldn't think straight."

    1. "You have to admit, it made the speech a lot more interesting."
    Somehow we think that that next Phillips family reunion may be a bit awkward.

    Posted on September 1, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Jay Leno to Sub For Roger Ebert

    Photo of Jay Leno and Richard RoeperJay Leno has agreed to step in for Roger Ebert while Ebert recovers from cancer surgery.
    Jay Leno's thumbs are about to get a workout. "The Tonight Show" host is filling in as a guest critic on the movie review show "Ebert & Roeper" while regular co-host Roger Ebert recuperates from cancer surgery. Leno's appearance with Richard Roeper will air nationally Saturday and Sunday. He will be the first of at least two guest hosts -- director Kevin Smith is slated to host in a show airing Aug. 12-13.

    "This promises to be a special experience," Roeper said in a statement. "He's (Leno) been a great friend to our program over the years, and it's a real privilege to have him join me across the aisle." Ebert, 64, is at a Chicago hospital, where he's in good condition "and improving each day" from surgery last month to repair complications from a previous cancer surgery, the show said in a statement. This week's episode of "Ebert & Roeper" was taped in Los Angeles to accommodate Leno's schedule.
    Leno's segments air today and tomorow in national syndication. Jay Leno is one of three guest hosts planned for the series: on August 12-13 director Kevin Smith will sit in Ebert's chair.

    Posted on August 4, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Did Stress Kill Ken Lay?

    There has been quite a bit of speculation about what caused Ken Lay's heart attack: was it the stress of waiting until October to hear that he had been sentenced (most likely) to life in prison? An autopsy reveals the answer: not likely. Although it was not publicized, Lay suffered from arteriosclerosis for years and had been on an aggresive treatment regimen since the mid-1990's. In other words, the stress didn't help, but it was his underlying clogged arteries that killed him.
    Lay, who was at his vacation home in Aspen, Colo., when he was stricken, also had a little-publicized history of heart problems. He died of "severe coronary-artery disease," a condition characterized by clogged arteries, according to the Mesa County coroner, as reported by the Rocky Mountain News.

    And ABC News reported that Lay had already suffered heart attacks, and had portable heart defibrillators in his houses and on his plane. He had been taking statins to lower his cholesterol, and, about five years ago, his doctors inserted a stent, apparently as a preventive measure.

    All these medical details of one prominent man's death could help ease the public perception that stress by itself could bring on a fatal heart attack.
    Associates reported to journalists that (pre-scandal) Lay had portable heart defibrillators stored everywhere he might be, from his plane to his office, to his homes because he knew he was at risk for a heart attack. His doctors were so concerned about his clogged arteries that they inserted a mesh stent, which Vice-President Dick Cheney also has. He also took cholesterol-lowering drugs and aspirin. There's no question that Lay was under a great deal of stress in the last two years, but cardiologists noted that the deaths from stress usually only occur in people who already have arteriosclerosis.

    The American Heart Association has more information about heart disease, arteriosclerosis and work-related stress on its website.

    Posted on July 7, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    White House: Ken Who?

    Former Enron CEO Ken Lay died of a massive coronary at his Colorado vacation home. His doctors said the coronary was unexpected. But most long-time media watchers will put it down to just one thing: stress from being convicted of multiple felony counts in connection with the collapse of Enron.

    Ken Lay and Enron were one of President Bush's largest political contributors and Bush called Lay "Kenny Boy." The two were known to be good friends. But the White House has remained silent about Lay's passing. White House Press Secretary Tony Snow inexpertly fielded reporters' questions about Lay.
    Q: What has been the President's reaction to the death of Ken Lay?

    SNOW: I really have not talked to him about it. I will give you my own personal reaction, which is that when somebody dies, you leave behind those that grieve, and I think that they deserve our compassion. But — I don’t know, what do you think would be the appropriate thing to say?

    Q: I do not know. I don't know him. The President was his friend, not me.

    SNOW: No, the President has described Ken Lay as an acquaintance, and many of the President's acquaintances have passed on during his time in office. Again, I think that it is sort of an interesting question but not answerable by me.
    Somehow, I don't think that President Bush will be making an appearance at the funeral. In fact, I expect him to have a prior engagement halfway across the globe on that day.

    Posted on July 5, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    The Googleplex Expands

    Google continues to merrily expand. This time, the company is building its secret weapon: a giant supercomputing center housed in a building the size of two football fields, with twin four-storey cooling plants. The New York Times explains what the company is up to now:
    The complex, sprawling like an information-age factory, heralds a substantial expansion of a worldwide computing network handling billions of search queries a day and a growing repertory of other Internet services. And odd as it may seem, the barren desert land surrounding the Columbia along the Oregon-Washington border — at the intersection of cheap electricity and readily accessible data networking — is the backdrop for a multibillion-dollar face-off among Google, Microsoft and Yahoo that will determine dominance in the online world in the years ahead.

    Microsoft and Yahoo have announced that they are building big data centers upstream in Wenatchee and Quincy, Wash., 130 miles to the north. But it is a race in which they are playing catch-up. Google remains far ahead in the global data-center race, and the scale of its complex here is evidence of its extraordinary ambition. Even before the Oregon center comes online, Google has lashed together a global network of computers — known in the industry as the Googleplex — that is a singular achievement. "Google has constructed the biggest computer in the world, and it's a hidden asset," said Danny Hillis, a supercomputing pioneer and a founder of Applied Minds, a technology consulting firm, referring to the Googleplex.

    The design and even the nature of the Google center in this industrial and agricultural outpost 80 miles east of Portland has been a closely guarded corporate secret. "Companies are historically sensitive about where their operational infrastructure is," acknowledged Urs Holzle, Google's senior vice president for operations. Behind the curtain of secrecy, the two buildings here — and a third that Google has a permit to build — will probably house tens of thousands of inexpensive processors and disks, held together with Velcro tape in a Google practice that makes for easy swapping of components. The cooling plants are essential because of the searing heat produced by so much computing power.

    The complex will tap into the region's large surplus of fiber optic networking, a legacy of the dot-com boom. The fact that Google is behind the data center, referred to locally as Project 02, has been reported in the local press. But many officials in The Dalles, including the city attorney and the city manager, said they could not comment on the project because they signed confidentiality agreements with Google last year. "No one says the 'G' word," said Diane Sherwood, executive director of the Port of Klickitat, Wash., directly across the river from The Dalles, who is not bound by such agreements. "It's a little bit like He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named in Harry Potter."
    Inside company documents reveal that by 2011 the Googleplex will include 800,000 servers all connected by fiber optic cable simply brimming with information.
    "Google is like the Borg," said Milo Medin, a computer networking expert who was a founder of the 1990's online service @Home, referring to the robotic species on "Star Trek" that was forcibly assembled from millions of species and computer components. "I know of no other carrier or enterprise that distributes applications on top of their computing resource as effectively as Google."
    Apparently the super-secretive Google is having a bit of a culture clash with its friendly, folksy new neighbors. The local Chamber of Commerce wants to organize a press-filled ribbon cutting ceremony to celebrate the opening of the mysterious new computer center. But Google's answer is merely a Cesar Millan-like "SHHHHHHH."

    Posted on June 14, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Ringtones Adults Can't Hear

    Students are now using a cellphone ringtone that adults can't hear. As humans age, they lose the ability to hear high frequency sounds. Students who want to hide their cellphone use in a classroom decided to use a ringtone that only they can hear. So, where did this weird ringtone come from, anyway?

    It was originally developed as an annoying high-pitched sound to play outside retail stores to disperse groups of teens. The theory was that the sound would drive away the teens, but wouldn't bother the adult shoppers that the stores wanted to attract.
    Students are using a new ring tone to receive messages in class — and many teachers can't even hear the ring. Some students are downloading a ring tone off the Internet that is too high-pitched to be heard by most adults. With it, high schoolers can receive text message alerts on their cell phones without the teacher knowing.

    As people age, many develop what's known as aging ear — a loss of the ability to hear higher-frequency sounds. The ring tone is a spin-off of technology that was originally meant to repel teenagers — not help them. A Welsh security company developed the tone to help shopkeepers disperse young people loitering in front of their stores while leaving adults unaffected. The company called their product the "Mosquito."

    Donna Lewis, a teacher in Manhattan, says her colleague played the ring for a classroom of first-graders — and all of them could hear it, while the adults couldn't hear anything.
    The Mosquito Ringtone is becoming quite popular. Click here to see if you can hear the ringtone. If you can't (and it's a horrifying high-pitched screech to me), then it's either time to see the audiologist or simply breathe a sigh of relief -- because it's absolutely ghastly to listen to.

    Posted on June 12, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Trying To Make the Sale? Be Sure To Bring Coffee

    Researchers have discovered that imbibing even moderate amounts of caffeine makes people easier to persuade.
    Scientists have discovered why dating couples invite each other home for a coffee: caffeine makes people more persuadable. Controlled experiments showed that after only moderate amounts, drinkers were more likely to agree with persuasive arguments.

    Pearl Martin, from the School of Psychology at the University of Queensland, said that the findings would not interest only courting couples. Politicians and advertisers would also take note. "Given the numerous situations in which people are exposed to persuasive arguments, these results could have many applied implications. Consider how caffeine-containing products might affect how persuaded a person is when listening to advertisements or a political speech," she said The results, published in the European Journal of Social Psychology, came from two experiments involving about 140 students in Western Australia.
    This has some interesting implications for advertising and marketing. Clearly, the best place to sell someone something is over a cozy quadruple shot latte at Starbucks.

    Posted on June 5, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Pat Robertson, the Magic Protein Shake And the 2,000 Lb. Leg Press

    Photo of Pat Robertson doing a leg press Televangelist Pat Robertson claims that he can leg press 2,000 pounds. That's right, 2,000 pounds. He attributes his super strength to his magic protein shake and his personal trainer saviour, Jesus Christ.
    Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson says he has leg-pressed 2,000 pounds, but some say he'd be in a pretty tough spot if he tried. The "700 Club" host's feat of strength is recounted on the Web site of his Christian Broadcasting Network, in a posting headlined "How Pat Robertson Leg Pressed 2,000 Pounds." This photo provided by the Christian Broadcasting Network shows religious broadcaster Pat Robertson leg pressing what is claimed to be 2,000 pounds at the fitness center at the Founders Inn on Regent University campus in Virginia Beach, Va., Feb. 1, 2003. A CBN spokesman claims the photo is from 2003 even though the date stamp on the photo says 8/1/1994.

    According to the CBN Web site, Robertson worked his way up to lifting a ton with the help of his physician, who is not named. The posting does not say when the lift occurred, but a CBN spokeswoman released photos to The Associated Press that she said showed Robertson lifting 2,000 pounds in 2003, when Robertson was 73. He is now 76.

    *****

    Clay Travis of CBS SportsLine.com called the 2,000-pound assertion impossible in a column this week, writing that the leg-press record for football players at Florida State University is 665 pounds less. "Where in the world did Robertson even find a machine that could hold 2,000 pounds at one time?" Travis asked.

    *****

    The CBN Web site attributes Robertson's energy in part to "his age-defying protein shake." The site offers a recipe for the shake, which contains ingredients such as soy protein isolate, whey protein isolate, flaxseed oil and apple cider vinegar.
    Oh please. He's just trying to outdo Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who has said she can leg press 400 lbs.

    Posted on May 27, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Writers Write, Inc Launches WatchersWatch.com

    We love to watch! TV, Film and video, that is. We're happy to announce the launch of WatchersWatch.com, our new blog about what's hot in movies, television and videos.

    What's hot this week at WatchersWatch? Why it's the Da Vinci Code, of course. Dan Brown's international bestseller opened in wide release Friday, May 19, 2006 and has already made $224 million worldwide in its first weekend, making it the second biggest opening weekend of all time.

    You can find our Da Vinci Code review roundup, the scoop on the new fall TV shows and much more at: http://www.watcherswatch.com

    Posted on May 21, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Stephen Colbert, Truthiness and a Shocked Press Corps

    Photo of Stephen ColbertComedian Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central's hit show The Colbert Report had a tough assignment Saturday night: he was the featured speaker at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner in Washington, D.C. The annual affair has a long-standing tradition of comedy: the president is expected to poke fun at himself (last year his wife Laura pulled no punches when making fun of her husband) and at the press corps. Politics, world leaders: nothing is off-limits for this evening which is invitation-only. But this year, quite a few people had a ringside seat as CSPAN played the video several times and various online outlets made the footage available.

    Colbert's schtick is his persona as an over the top talk show host who is a bombastic amalgam of Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and various other personalities (I've seen homages to both Aaron Brown and Lou Dobbs, as well.) So when Colbert took the podium to declare his absolute adoration of President Bush and his "fabulous" foreign policies, we all knew what was coming. After his monologue, he then showed a brilliant comedy bit where Colbert imagined himself as President Bush's new press secretary. He had three secret buttons on his podium, including a Volume button (to reduce the sound on individual reporters when they became irritating) and a Gannon button to hit if the questions were getting too incisive.

    In his live speech, Colbert gleefully skewered nearly everyone in the room, starting with Vice President Dick Cheney -- who mysteriously was not in attendance.
    Wow. Wow, what an honor. The White House correspondents' dinner. To actually sit here, at the same table with my hero, George W. Bush, to be this close to the man. I feel like I'm dreaming. Somebody pinch me. You know what? I'm a pretty sound sleeper -- that may not be enough. Somebody shoot me in the face. Is he really not here tonight? Dammit. The one guy who could have helped.
    The Iraq War:
    I believe the government that governs best is the government that governs least. And by these standards, we have set up a fabulous government in Iraq.
    The religious right:
    I believe in pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps. I believe it is possible -- I saw this guy do it once in Cirque du Soleil. It was magical. And though I am a committed Christian, I believe that everyone has the right to their own religion, be you Hindu, Jewish or Muslim. I believe there are infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior. [Note: Colbert is a practicing Catholic, if you're keeping score on those kinds of things.]
    The president and his approval ratings:
    I believe in this president. Now, I know there are some polls out there saying this man has a 32% approval rating. But guys like us, we don't pay attention to the polls. We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in "reality." And reality has a well-known liberal bias.

    Sir, pay no attention to the people who say the glass is half empty, because 32% means it's 2/3 empty. There's still some liquid in that glass is my point, but I wouldn't drink it. The last third is usually backwash.

    *****

    The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man's beliefs never will.
    Photo ops:
    I stand by this man. I stand by this man because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message, that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound -- with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world.
    Fox News:
    As excited as I am to be here with the president, I am appalled to be surrounded by the liberal media that is destroying America, with the exception of Fox News. Fox News gives you both sides of every story: the president's side, and the vice president's side.
    Journalists in need of a spine transplant:
    As excited as I am to be here with the president, I am appalled to be surrounded by the liberal media that is destroying America, with the exception of Fox News. Fox News gives you both sides of every story: the president's side, and the vice president's side.

    But the rest of you, what are you thinking, reporting on NSA wiretapping or secret prisons in eastern Europe? Those things are secret for a very important reason: they're super-depressing. And if that's your goal, well, misery accomplished. Over the last five years you people were so good -- over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn't want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out. Those were good times, as far as we knew.

    But, listen, let's review the rules. Here's how it works: the president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know - fiction!
    Even John McCain and his so-called "maverick" image could not escape unscathed:
    John McCain is here. John McCain, John McCain, what a maverick! Somebody find out what fork he used on his salad, because I guarantee you it wasn't a salad fork. This guy could have used a spoon! There's no predicting him. By the way, Senator McCain, it's so wonderful to see you coming back into the Republican fold. I have a summer house in South Carolina; look me up when you go to speak at Bob Jones University. So glad you've seen the light, sir.
    Afterwards, President Bush got up, shook Colbert's hand and told him that he did a good job -- you just know that presidents hate these things. Clearly, Cheney just couldn't stand the idea of sitting through all those "shot a guy in the face" jokes, several of which were told by President Bush.

    Stephen Colbert has brought back the subtle and difficult art of irony. His performance was absolutely hilarious. And that's the Wørd.

    You can see a video clip of Colbert's performance here and you can see a full transcript of Colbert's routine here.

    Posted on May 1, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Jon Stewart's Stellar Oscar Performance

    Jon Stewart did an excellent job hosting the Oscars last night. It's a thankless task, really (other than the nice paycheck, of course). Hollywood stars don't really like to be made fun of (think Chris Rock's disastrous performance as host, for example), the show is entirely too long with all the absurd montages about film noir and movies that "really should be seen on the big screen." But Stewart managed to pull it off. Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper gave Stewart two thumbs up, noting that he reminded them of the best Oscar host ever: Johnny Carson. I quite agree. Here were some of the best bits of the night:
    • The opening short film in which the previous Oscar hosts all turned down the job. The first scene showed Chris Rock and Billy Crystal peeking out of a Brokeback Mountain tent saying they were "too busy" to host the show. Whoopi Goldberg closed the door on the producers answering ("Oh, Hell no!"), David Letterman and Steve Martin both declined so they could spend more time with Martin's (fictional) children "so they won't grow up weird," Mr. Moviephone was "unavailable." Mel Gibson turned the job down while speaking in the ancient Mayan dialect that he's using in his new film.
    • Stewart's jab at the media: while discussing best picture nominee Capote, Stewart said, "Capote, of course, addressed similar themes to Good Night, and Good Luck. Both films are about determined journalists defying obstacles in a relentless pursuit of truth. Needless to say, both are period pieces."
    • The one Dick Cheney joke: "Bjφrk couldn't be here tonight," Stewart said, referring to the singer's infamous swan dress. "She was trying on her dress and Dick Cheney shot her."
    • The series of Swift Boat Veteran-style political attack ads for the feuding Best Actress Nominees, created by Stewart and The Daily Show team and narrated by Stephen Colbert. In one ad, British ladies each discussed why Dame Judi Dench shouldn't win: "She once punched me in the eye during a bar fight," one confided. Keira Knightly looked completely confused during her own fictional campaign ad against Charlize Theron in which she accused Theron of simply "hagging it up" in movies to win. Perhaps they don't have political attack ads in England, where Keira Knightly grew up...but somehow that seems unlikely. The ads were quite clever; on the last screen each ad said "Paid for by the candidate's mother" or by some shadowy organization.
    • Looking over his shoulder at a giant, 40' Oscar statue, Stewart wondered "If we pulled that statue down, do you think democracy would flourish in Hollywood? Maybe James Caan could then hit Oscar in the face with a shoe."
    • Returning from a commercial break, the camera catches Stewart ranting to the audience: "And that is why I think Scientology is right, not just for this city, but for the country" before he realizes that the show is live again. The Scientologists in the audience may not have thought that was funny, but I thought it was absolutely hilarious.
    Other than the time-wasting montages, the most irritating thing this year was the Bill Conti orchestra playing music while the winners were giving their acceptance speeches. Crazy acceptance speeches are what make the Oscars entertaining! Let them cry, give bizarre shout-outs and rave about political issues. And please invite Jon Stewart back next year.

    Posted on March 6, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Dubai Ports World Tries To Censor Lou Dobbs

    CNN's Lou Dobbs reports that Dubai Ports World (which is controlled by the government of the United Arab Emirates) is trying to censor his reporting on the UAE ports deal. They told CNN that if they didn't "shut up Lou Dobbs" they wouldn't allow CNN to film any of their oprations around the world, nor would they allow any CNN reporter to interview anyone from their company. You can see the video here.
    Lou Dobbs reported today that "Dubai Ports World" officials have tried to silence him and get CNN to suppress his reports.

    Mark Dennis, spokesman for Dubai Ports World said: "CNN won't shut up Lou Dobbs." They are refusing to give any more interviews to CNN or allow them to video tape their operations overseas. To CNN's credit they have refused to comply with their demands.
    Lou gave his opinion that he believes that Bush Administration officials are not being honest with the American public about the real reason behind the ports deal.

    Kudos to CNN for refusing to kowtow to the thugs at Dubai Ports World. If this doesn't prove that this is not the company to be running our ports, I don't know what does.

    Posted on February 28, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Latest Developments in Quailgate

    Here are some of the latest developments in Quailgate:

  • The political cartoonists have been busy. Cagle.com, the website of professional cartoonist Daryl Cagle, has a collection of dozens of the cartoons.
  • Vice President Dick Cheney, who is known to take heart medication, had at least two drinks that day. He told Brit Hume during the interview on Fox that he drank one beer at lunch several hours before the shooting took place. He also drank a cocktail later that evening after the shooting according to comments that Katharine Armstrong made to CNN.
  • Fox News has the complete transcript of Brit Hume's interview with Dick Cheney. Journalists were hoping he would give a press conference about the accidental shooting instead. Many journalists also argue that Cheney did not explain the long delay in reporting the story. This article lists some of the questions journalists have for the Vice President. However, President Bush was satisfied with Cheney's answers.
  • Alan Dershowitz explains why he thinks the long delay in reporting the story means something is being covered up. Dershowitz uses a cost/benefit analysis to explain his argument.
  • An article in the New York Times cites a quail hunter who says Cheney had to have been "far closer" than 30 yards for the victim to have been hit with that many pellets.
  • A CBS News story said Karl Rove pushed Cheney to do the interview with Fox News. The article said Cheney is in a "state of meltdown" over shooting his friend and the political fallout it created.
  • David Letterman has the Top Ten Dick Cheney Excuses.
  • Media Matters notes that many media outlets did not report that contradiction between Cheney's beer consumption and ranch owner Katharine Armstrong's comments that Dr. Pepper was served at lunch.
  • The local sherrif's office has closed its investigation. No charges will be filed.

    Posted on February 16, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

  • Iran Ups the Ante With Holocaust Cartoon Contest

    The Islamic fury over the Mohammed cartoons continues into midweek with more violent protests in the Middle Eastern countries. Several people were killed today in protests in Afghanistan. Adding fuel to the fire, a French weekly newspaper called Charlie Hebdo reprinted the cartoons then -- just for good measure -- added a new one, according to a Reuters news story.
    The French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo reprinted cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad on Wednesday and published one of its own, further angering Muslim groups.

    The weekly's front page carried the new cartoon depicting the Prophet Mohammad burying his face in his hands and saying: "It's hard to be loved by fools." President Jacques Chirac condemned "overt provocations" which could enflame passions. "Anything that can hurt the convictions of someone else, in particular religious convictions, should be avoided," Chirac said.

    Moderate Muslims, while condemning the cartoons, have expressed fears that radicals are hijacking the debate over the boundary between media freedom and religious respect.
    Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that the boycotts of Danish products continue, and in Palestine there are threats to kidnap Westerners.
    In countries including Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, Muslims are boycotting Danish goods, and, in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian militants threatened to kidnap Westerners if governments don't apologize for the actions of newspapers in their countries. Iran cut trade relations with Denmark when President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Feb. 4 issued a decree calling on the Trade Ministry to terminate economic agreements with all Western countries where the cartoons were published.
    But the Award for the Most Disgusting Yet Juvenile Response to the Cartoons by an Official Government Agency clearly goes to Iran. The daily Hamshahri, one of Iran's five biggest newspapers, is running a contest asking for cartoons ridiculing the Holocaust. The Iranian government supports the contest (the municipal government owns the newspaper in question.)

    Last night on The Colbert Report, Stephen Colbert revealed that the Muslims had been "Punk'd"; he then proceeded to do a standup routine showing how "one man's joke is another man's jihad."

    What the protestors don't seem to realize is that the more out of control and violent the protests, the more difficult it's going to be for mainstream newspapers and TV shows to explain the story without showing the cartoons themselves.

    Posted on February 8, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Mohammed Cartoons Spark Rage in Middle East

    The republishing of cartoons featuring the prophet Mohammed have caused outrage in some Islamic communities. The cartoons were originally published in Denmark in the Danish newspaper called Jyllands-Posten. The Financial Times reports that Danish products are being boycotted in some Middle East countries.
    Publication of the cartoons in Spain, Italy, France, Germany and the Netherlands triggered condemnation in the Muslim and Arab world, where consumers turned their anger on Danish companies.

    Arla, the dairy company based in Denmark, where the cartoons were first published, admitted on Thursday its sales in some Middle East countries had fallen to zero. Carrefour, the French retailer, said it had removed Danish products from shelves in its Middle East operations.

    Other Danish companies targeted in the boycott include Lego, the toymaker, and Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceuticals company.

    As popular protests spread, the leaders of Egypt and Afghanistan warned the cartoons had offended millions of Muslims and could be exploited by terrorists in their war against the west.
    Of course, in their righteous zeal to denounce an unflattering comic portraying Mohammed, they are conveniently ignoring the offensive anti-Semitic and anti-Christian comics that run every day in the mainstream, supposedly "moderate" Arab media.

    A Deutsche Welle article reports that an independent Jordanian newspapers has published the controversial cartoons.
    Meanwhile, a Jordanian gossip tabloid defiantly published three of the cartoons that have triggered outrage in the Arab and Muslim world.

    "Muslims of the world, be reasonable," said the editor-in-chief of the weekly independent newspaper Al-Shihan in an editorial alongside the cartoons, including the one showing the Muslim religion's founder wearing a bomb-shaped turban.
    Editor & Publisher also has articles on the story including a fired French editor and protest by gunmen in the Gaza Strip. In the blogosphere the topic is being heavily discussed. If you run a Technorati search for "Jyllands-posten Mohammed," there are hundreds of posts. CJR Daily blogs about the blogosphere coverage and says the blogs uncovered this collection of depictions of Mohammed throughout history which includes a few of the recent cartoons.

    Right now various European newspapers are trying to decide whether to cave into this xenophobic nonsense and refuse to run editorial cartoons or to be brave and stand up for freedom of expression. If anyone is offended by the Danish cartoons and wants to show his displeasure by refusing to buy Danish Butter Cookies or some of the other myriad Danish products that are being removed from Middle Eastern store shelves, fine. That's a non-violent way to protest (although it's quite unfair to Danish companies who had nothing to do with the cartoons in question). But if anyone carries out a threat of violence to innocent bystanders -- Danish or otherwise -- because of a cartoon, they they should be dealt with in a very harsh manner.

    Why not show your support for free speech by either 1) eating a delicious Danish Butter Cookie, 2) buying a Bang & Olufson stereo system or 3) buying a new set of Legos for a favorite child.

    Posted on February 2, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |

    Stephen Colbert to Headline White House Correspondents Dinner

    Update: See my critique of Stephen Colbert's performance here

    Fishbowl DC reports that Stephen Colbert will be headlining the White House Correspondents Dinner.
    Word out of the White House today, that the fake Bill O'Reilly will headline the White House Correspondents' Association dinner in April. Fresh off of making fun of the entire Washington punditocracy, the White House Correspondents Association will today announce that Stephen Colbert will be the head entertainer.

    Last year, the dashing Stephen Colbert, then a mere Daily Show correspondent, was the guest of ABC News' Jake Tapper and sat through a not-very-well-received Lewis Black talk. This year Colbert had been courted by straightlaced competitor Jim Lehrer.
    The main question to be answered is whether Colbert will appear in character as the blowhard rightwing, egomaniacal pundit from The Colbert Report and if he does, what will those in the audience who haven't seen the show think? This could be very funny, indeed.

    Posted on January 27, 2006
    Permalink | | | Comments (View) |



    Our Blogs

    Bloggers Blog
    Book Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write News
    Writer's Blog





    www.mediacynic.com
    Copyright © 2003-2010 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.