MediaCynic.com

Archives
Homepage
Linking to Us
Recent Headlines




Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator



Add to Pluck



Categories

2008 Election
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Economy
John Edwards
Entertainment
Environment
Al Gore
Health Care
Immigration
International
Iraq
John Kerry
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Plamegate
Politics
Polls
Religion
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Scandals
Science
Social security
Supreme Court
Taxes
Technology




May, 2005 Archives


Deep Throat is Finally Revealed

It's now official: Bob Woodward has confirmed that the former second in command at the FBI, W. Mark Felt, was Deep Throat, the main source for Woodward and Bernstein's Watergate, which brought down President Richard Nixon. The secret was finally let out in a Vanity Fair article, in which Felt admitted that he was the deep cover source that Woodward and Bernstein vowed never to reveal until after his death.
The Vanity Fair story said Felt had admitted his "historic, anonymous role" following years of denial.

In a statement today, Woodward and Bernstein said, "W. Mark Felt was 'Deep Throat' and helped us immeasurably in our Watergate coverage. However, as the record shows, many other sources and officials assisted us and other reporters for the hundreds of stories that were written in The Washington Post about Watergate."

Felt's guidance to Woodward -- provided on "deep background" in secret meetings -- helped keep public attention focused on the June 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington's Watergate office and apartment complex, and on a subsequent cover-up effort. This ultimately led to a congressional investigation that revealed the role of Nixon and a number of his top aides. Under threat of impeachment, Nixon resigned in 1974.

Woodward, Bernstein and Bradlee had kept the identity of "Deep Throat" secret at the source's request, saying his name would be revealed upon his death. "We've kept that secret because we keep our word," Woodward said.

But with the Vanity Fair article and the family's statement, the three decided today to break their silence. Bradlee said today, "The thing that stuns me is that the goddamn secret has lasted this long." He was the Post's executive editor during Watergate and now is a vice president of the newspaper.


Posted on May 31, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Kim Jong Il Wants More Nuclear Tests

Unhappy that he hasn't been the center of attention lately, what with France voting down the EU Constiution and more suicide bombers in Iraq, Kim Jong Il is once again threatening to conduct more nuclear tests. And it looks like the White House putting more pressure on North Korea to get back to the ever-so-helpful six party talks.
Vice-president Dick Cheney stepped up America's war of words with North Korea yesterday by calling it a police state run by an irresponsible leader indifferent to the fate of his malnourished people.

His words came just 48 hours after the Pentagon announced that it was sending 15 F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighter-bombers to South Korea, a US ally, for an undetermined period. The aircraft crews, trained to seek out targets with precision weapons, needed to familiarise themselves with the Korean terrain, the air force said.

Speaking to CNN in an interview broadcast last night, Mr. Cheney described North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Il, as "one of the world's more irresponsible leaders."

Mr. Cheney went on to accuse Kim of running "a police state" and of maintaining one of the most heavily militarised societies in the world. He said most North Koreans lived "in abject poverty and stages of malnutrition". The statement appeared to be a reference to the North Korean famine, widely blamed on the country's communist elite, which has killed hundreds of thousands of people.

The vice-president continued: "He doesn't take care of his people at all, and he obviously wants to throw his weight around and become a nuclear power."
Well, that's all certainly true enough. But the question is: what exactly are we going to about it? We are awash in a sea of red ink from the apparently endless Iraq War. You can only ignore the deficit for so long, as President Bush's father found out -- the hard way.

Posted on May 31, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.




House Defies Bush on Stem Cells

In a somewhat surprising turn of events, the House of Representatives voted to approve a bill which would loosen current restriction on using federal funds for embryonic stem cell research.
The vote, 238 to 194 with 50 Republicans in favor, fell far short of the two-thirds majority required to overturn a presidential veto, setting up a possible showdown between Congress and Mr. Bush, who has never exercised his veto power. An identical bill has broad bipartisan support in the Senate; moments after the House vote, the Senate sponsors wrote to the Republican leader, Bill Frist, urging him to put it on the agenda.

The House action is the first vote on embryonic stem cell research since August 2001, when Mr. Bush opened the door to taxpayer financing for the studies, but only with strict limits. The new bill permits the government to pay for studies involving human embryos that are in frozen storage at fertility clinics, so long as couples conceiving the embryos certified that they had made a decision to discard them.
This is far from becoming law. But it's the first major indication that the sensible side of the Republican party is waking up and realizing that James Dobson and his ilk are slowly killing off scientific progress. Stem cell research is popular, especially to any American who knows someone who suffers from diabetes, Alzheimer's, nerve degeneration or other other medical conditions which could benefit from the research. Will Bush really veto such popular legislation? That will be interesting to see.

Posted on May 25, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Nuclear Showdown Averted: For Now

The Senate has reached a deal which averts a nuclear showdown over the filibuster: for now, anyway.
Under a compromise reached by an assortment of moderates, mavericks and senior statesmen just as the Senate was headed into its climactic overnight debate over the filibuster, three previously blocked appeals court nominees, Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Priscilla R. Owen - will get floor votes. No commitment was made on the fate of two others, William Myers and Henry Saad.

In addition, the seven Democrats in the deal said they were committed to filibuster future judicial nominees only under "extraordinary" circumstances, while their Republican counterparts promised to support no changes in Senate rules that would alter the filibuster rule, effectively denying the 50 votes it would take to enact such a rules change.
Frist grumped about the deal and admitted that he had no part in it, then tried to spin it as a good thing he helped accomplish. What a weasel. Does he not understand that as Marjority Leader he has been shown--yet again--to be ineffective? Dobson is going to read him the riot act. Under the terms of the deal, any one Senator who feels there are "extraordinary" circumstances, can invoke the filibuster once again. This is far from over. Just wait until we have two vacancies on the Supreme Court.

Posted on May 24, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Political Roundup 5-23-05

  • Kathy Ireland is worried about her three sons getting drafted.
  • President Bush wishes he had a magic wand to lower gas prices: "Americans are concerned about high prices at the pump and they're really concerned as they start making their travel plans, and I understand that," the president said. "I wish I could just wave a magic wand and lower the price at the pump. I'd do that. But that's not how it works."
  • A new website has launched to explain the revealing British memo that the Bush administration wants to ignore.
  • Pleasant Morning Buzz has the complete story arch of last week's Pelosi shoe drama. (Part 1, 2, 3)
  • The U.S. Government says no to ads in space.
  • Lots of bloggers are talking about the Washington Post story about the military's coverup of how former NFL player and ranger Pat Tillman was killed in Afghanistan.
  • Al Franken wants to know where that $8.8 billion for the Iraq reconstruction went.
  • CNN reports on George Lucas' comments about how Star Wars compares to current U.S. policy in Iraq:
    "In terms of evil, one of the original concepts was how does a democracy turn itself into a dictatorship," Lucas told a news conference at Cannes, where his final episode had its world premiere.

    "The parallels between what we did in Vietnam and what we're doing in Iraq now are unbelievable."

    "On the personal level it was how does a good person turn into a bad person, and part of the observation of that is that most bad people think they are good people, they are doing it for the right reasons," he added.


    Posted on May 23, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.




  • Bush Vows Stem Cell Veto

    Although he has never exercised the presidential veto, today President Bush vowed to veto new stem cell legislation that eases current restrictions. The New York Times reports:
    "I am a strong supporter of stem cell research, but I've made very clear to Congress that the use of federal taxpayer money to promote science that destroys life in order to save life, I am against this," said Mr. Bush, speaking in the Oval Office during a brief joint appearance with the Danish prime minister, Anders Rasmussen. "Therefore, if the bill does that, I will veto it."

    The president also expressed grave concerns about a report that South Korean researchers have perfected a method of cloning human embryos to extract their stem cells that could, theoretically, be used to develop treatments and cures that would be exact genetic matches to patients.

    "I'm very concerned about cloning," Mr. Bush said. "I worry about a world in which cloning becomes acceptable."

    "The United States is being left farther behind every day, this morning by South Korea," said [Republican Senator Arlen] Specter. He added, "I don't like veto threats and I don't like comments about overriding the veto, but this issue is going to be the focal point of my subcommittee."

    The Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid of Nevada, said in a statement: "Embryonic stem cell research provides us the hope of new cures and therapies and we should embrace this research opportunity and not allow radical ideology to stand in the way. President Bush has made the wrong choice, putting politics ahead of safe, responsible science."
    South Korea is moving ahead with therapeutic cloning and announced a breakthrough this week. England is also moving ahead on stem cells. But it looks like the United States will be lagging far behind on scientific breakthroughs, as the White House panders to religious extremists and ignores the possibilities of stem cell research to improve the lives of the sick, suffering and injured.

    Posted on May 20, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Poll Numbers Dropping for Bush and Congress

    MSNBC reports on the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, and the numbers are not good news for either President Bush or Congress. The American public is unhappy with Bush, Congress and the priorities they are pursuing. A majority of Americans think that Congress should be focusing on the economy, gas prices and healthcare, not privatizing Social Security or battling over judges. In fact, a majority of Americans want the Senate to decide the fitness of each nominee to be a judge on its own and not just rubber stamp the White House's nominations. That's not good news for Frist and the anti-filibusterers.
    The survey, which polled 1,005 adults from May 12-16 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, also has some troubling findings for President Bush. Just 20 percent of those polled say the economy has gotten better over the past 12 months, an 11- point decline since January; 51 percent believe that removing Saddam Hussein from power was not worth the cost and casualties of that war; and only 36 percent support Bush’s plan to allow workers to invest their Social Security contributions in the stock market.

    Most don't support blanket approval for judges That Social Security figure, which is virtually unchanged from April, is significant because it suggests that Bush hasn’t moved the country any closer to supporting private accounts despite his months-long campaign for them.

    Regarding the contentious debate over Bush’s judicial nominees, just 34 percent say the Senate should generally confirm the president’s judicial picks as long as they are honest and competent, while 56 percent argue that the Senate should make its own decision about the fitness of each nominee to serve.

    Overall, according to the NBC/Journal poll, 52 percent believe the nation is headed in the wrong direction, while 35 percent think it’s on the right track.

    All of these findings, Hart says, are signs of an angry electorate. "If you are a member of Congress and you got the poll back, you better be looking over your shoulder," he said. "The masses are not happy."
    This poll reports that 47% of Americans want the Democrats to take over Congress in 2006, versus 40% who want Republicans to stay in charge. It's still too early to say if those numbers will hold until the midterms. But one thing's for sure: if James Dobson continues his Svengali-like hold on Frist and the Senate's agenda, things could go ill for Republicans in 2006.

    Posted on May 19, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.




    Desecration Comes in Many Forms

    Lee Smith has a very interesting article in Slate entitled "Quranic Etiquette: Why My Egyptian Doorman Ate My Homework" that explains all the things you can't do to the Koran. Apparently, it's a desecration even to mention the book in such a frivolous format as this blog. And that's just the beginning. There are rules for how the book can be displayed, who is allowed to touch it and when (never after you've touched a dog, for example).
    Some Quranic etiquette is intellectual: One should pronounce each word correctly; one should seek to discover what difficult words mean. There are also prestige issues. For instance, one should not place any other book on top of the Quran. This last was a violation that my Cairo doorman Muhammad was ever concerned to root out. Once he had satisfied himself that I had not put the Quran under any other book or item in my apartment, he would instruct me to pour us both a glass of whiskey, after which he would not touch the Quran again until he was sober and had somewhat repented for a clear transgression.

    Once, Muhammad discovered in my garbage an exam I had taken that tested knowledge of certain ayat (or verses) from the Quran, and he reproached me for putting the holy book in the trash. I said that it was not the Quran itself, but only words taken from it. His response was astonishing: "You can either burn your exam," he explained, "or do this...." At which point, he tore off a verse, rolled it up, put it into his mouth, and swallowed it. I note that Muhammad was a doorman and not a scholar, but apparently in this particular instance, there was no problem if the Quran was to wind up in the toilet presently.....

    At any rate, it is dangerous to invest artifacts with too much metaphysical significance. The fact that many Muslims regard the Quran as the literal word of God, as we have frequently been reminded over the last week, poses an enormous problem. Without reinterpreting or recontextualizing a sacred text that suited the exigencies of an ancient Arabian community, it is going to be difficult for 21st-century believers to get along with non-Muslims on a very small planet.
    I don't recall anything like that in Sunday School at all. All we got was "don't eat the paste." But we did have some really cool Old Testament comics. Somehow I don't think those would be allowed either.

    Posted on May 19, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Flushed With Enthusiasm

    It looks like the allegations of Koran-flushing are nothing new. Harper's Magazine has posted on its website a transcript from the March, 2005 issue in which an Afghan detainee talks about his experience with interrogators who shoved his Koran in a toilet.

    This entire debacle points out -- among other things -- the need for an overhaul of how the U.S. gathers intelligence from prisoners. Perhaps tearing up a Koran in front of a Muslim is likely to make him reveal important information, but it seems unlikely.

    Torture doesn't work. It's too low-tech, and people will simply lie to make the pain stop. A reading of any of the memoirs by ex-CIA agents will reveal that there are modern drugs which can make enemy combatants talk with one injection, that causes no damage to the subject. The legal argument for the very existence of Guantánamo Bay is that the prisoners there are enemy combatants captured during hostilities, and that they have information that could stop another terrorist attack. Yet we don't seem to have gathered any usable intel from these interrogations. Why is that? Did we capture the wrong guys? Are our interrogation methods ineffective?

    Desecrating a Koran in front of a Muslim is only going to lead to a public relations nightmare. Building naked prisoner pyramids only makes the U.S. look really sick. These kinds of behavior don't advance any logical goal of the U.S., and should not be tolerated by the Pentagon. We agree to The Geneva Conventions to protect our soldiers when they are captured. This isn't helping.

    Posted on May 18, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Supreme Court Boosts Interstate Direct Wine Sales

    Wine wholesalers and distributors fought against it, but The Supreme Court struck down the struck down Michigan and New York's bans on interstate wine sales.
    By a 5-to-4 vote, the court overturned state liquor laws in New York and Michigan that gave preferential treatment to in-state wineries. Both states permit in-state wineries to ship directly to consumers, bypassing both retailers and wholesalers.

    Michigan prohibited direct shipment by out-of-state wineries while New York nominally permitted it for out-of-state wineries that maintain a New York office, a requirement that no out-of-state winery has met and that the majority on Monday found so financially burdensome for small wineries as to amount to a prohibition.

    In his majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said both states were engaging in the kind of protectionism that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution forbids and that the 21st Amendment does not excuse. The 21st Amendment repealed Prohibition and granted the states much leeway in regulating alcohol. But "state regulation of alcohol is limited by the nondiscrimination principle of the Commerce Clause," Justice Kennedy said.
    So, the bottom line is that it goes back to the states. Each state can either allow direct wine sales to consumers for both in-state and out of state wineries, or it can ban all direct sales to consumers. 15 states now have bans on direct to consumer sales of wine: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee and Utah. The other states' laws are a confusing patchwork mess, and have all been invalidated by the ruling.

    So, look for lots of arguments about wine sales coming soon to your state legislature.

    Posted on May 17, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Did Newsweek Get It Wrong?

    So after igniting riots in the Muslim world with its story about how U.S. interrogators at Guantánamo Bay tore up copies of the Koran and flushed them down the toilet to upset detainees, it appears that the Newsweek story that started it all may not have been true.
    By the end of the week, the rioting had spread from Afghanistan throughout much of the Muslim world, from Gaza to Indonesia. Mobs shouting "Protect our Holy Book!" burned down government buildings and ransacked the offices of relief organizations in several Afghan provinces. The violence cost at least 15 lives, injured scores of people and sent a shudder through Washington, where officials worried about the stability of moderate regimes in the region.

    The spark was apparently lit at a press conference held on Friday, May 6, by Imran Khan, a Pakistani cricket legend and strident critic of Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf. Brandishing a copy of that week's Newsweek (dated May 9), Khan read a report that U.S. interrogators at Guantánamo prison had placed the Qur'an on toilet seats and even flushed one. "This is what the U.S. is doing," exclaimed Khan, "desecrating the Qur'an." His remarks, as well as the outraged comments of Muslim clerics and Pakistani government officials, were picked up on local radio and played throughout neighboring Afghanistan. Radical Islamic foes of the U.S.-friendly regime of Hamid Karzai quickly exploited local discontent with a poor economy and the continued presence of U.S. forces, and riots began breaking out last week.
    The Pentagon refuted the story and, after the story's main source appears to be recanting his allegation, Newsweek has had to issue a formal apology. "We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst," Newsweek Editor Mark Whitaker wrote in a note to readers.

    All parties are continuing to investigate the allegations. All we know for sure is that this is the kind of inflammatory information that should be thoroughly verified before it's reported. The consequences of not verifying such a story are just too dire.

    Posted on May 16, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    U.S. Mayors Join Kyoto in Defiance of Bush

    Fed up with rising children's asthma rates and breathing polluted air, a bipartisan group of 132 U.S. mayors is defying President Bush and embracing the Kyoto Treaty on their own. The New York Times reports:
    Unsettled by a series of dry winters in this normally wet city, Mayor Greg Nickels has begun a nationwide effort to do something the Bush administration will not: carry out the Kyoto Protocol on global warming.

    Mayor Greg Nickels of Seattle formed a bipartisan coalition of mayors to adopt the Kyoto Protocol on global warming on the local level.

    Mr. Nickels, a Democrat, says 131 other likeminded mayors have joined a bipartisan coalition to fight global warming on the local level, in an implicit rejection of the administration's policy.

    The mayors, from cities as liberal as Los Angeles and as conservative as Hurst, Tex., represent nearly 29 million citizens in 35 states, according to Mayor Nickels's office. They are pledging to have their cities meet what would have been a binding requirement for the nation had the Bush administration not rejected the Kyoto Protocol: a reduction in heat-trapping gas emissions to levels 7 percent below those of 1990, by 2012.

    On Thursday, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg brought New York City into the coalition, the latest Republican mayor to join.
    The White House said it opposed the treaty because it would cost 5 million American jobs. But the mayors think otherwise. They say that global warming is threatening the water supply in California, and flooding could easily destroy New Orleans and that action must be taken now. They also say that reducing emissions actually creates jobs and economic growth.
    The coalition is not the first effort by local leaders to take up the initiative on climate change. California, under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, is moving to limit carbon dioxide emissions, and Gov. George A. Pataki of New York, also a Republican, has led efforts to reduce power plant emissions in the Northeast. But the coalition is unusual in its open embrace of an international agreement that the Bush administration has spurned, Mayor Nickels's office said, and is significant because cities are huge contributors to the nation's emission of heat-trapping gases.
    Global warming and polluted air are not partisan issues. They are issues for anyone that breathes. Reducing pollution just makes good economic sense. After all, think of how much we could save on healthcare if we had less asthma and lung disease to treat?

    Posted on May 14, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Voinovich Throws in the Towel on Bolton

    In a dramatic denouement to the Bolton Senate Committee fight, Republican Senator George Voinovich threw in the towel and voted to allow John Bolton's nommination as U.N. Ambassador to go the Senate floor for a vote. The word is that the White House has come down really hard on Voinovich and Chafee after their expressions of distaste for Mr. Bolton's antics at the State Department.

    So Voinovich, looking like the very picture of misery, gave an impassioned speech which basically said that Bolton is a sociopath and completely unfit for the job, but that he would vote yes to allow him to get a full Senate vote. Then he said that he would be voting "No" when it came to the Senate floor. So, he caved, but he did it his way. His "I'll allow Bolton's nomination to go to the full Senate for a vote, but I sure as hell will be voting against the bastard" speech stunned listeners. It confused some. But I think that Steven C. Clemons, writing for UPI, gets the analysis right as to why Voinovich did what he did.
    In clear daylight, the White House is intimidating Richard Lugar, Chuck Hagel, poor Lincoln Chafee, Lamar Alexander and Lisa Murkowski -- the moderates on the Republican side of the Committee -- much like Bolton intimidated the national intelligence bureaucracy of the U.S. government. In the case of the intel analysts, their bosses saved them from Bolton. But no one is saving these senators from Cheneyesque efforts to completely subordinate the Senate to the whims of the White House.

    George Voinovich saved himself by indicating he would not support Bolton's nomination. Despite voting in favor of moving Bolton's nomination to the floor of the Senate without recommendation, Voinovich has assured weeks more of pain for the White House on Bolton and has shored up some Democrats who were beginning to wilt under the pressure of a convincing psy-ops campaign by the White House last weekend claiming the Republicans had assembled a party-line vote "in favor" of Bolton's confirmation -- which was false. And Voinovich has created space for principled internationalists in his own party to defect from the Cheney-Bolton pressure cooker.
    So, now the full Senate can debate 1) John Bolton's alleged abuse of his ex-wife, 2) his lying to the Senate Committee, and 3) his fitness to be Ambassador to the U.N. But even George Tenant wouldn't call this confirmation hearing "a slam dunk."

    Posted on May 13, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Writers Write, Inc. Launches Pleasant Morning Buzz

    Writers Write, Inc., the parent company of MediaCynic.com, has announced the launch of the newest Blog in our Network: Pleasant Morning Buzz. Pleasant Morning Buzz features light-hearted commentary about current events and items of interest.

    Posted on May 13, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Buchanan Crosses the Line With World War II Column

    Pat Buchanan really crosses the line with a new column in which he questions whether World War II was worth fighting.
    When one considers the losses suffered by Britain and France -- hundreds of thousands dead, destitution, bankruptcy, the end of the empires -- was World War II worth it, considering that Poland and all the other nations east of the Elbe were lost anyway?

    If the objective of the West was the destruction of Nazi Germany, it was a "smashing" success. But why destroy Hitler? If to liberate Germans, it was not worth it. After all, the Germans voted Hitler in.

    If it was to keep Hitler out of Western Europe, why declare war on him and draw him into Western Europe? If it was to keep Hitler out of Central and Eastern Europe, then, inevitably, Stalin would inherit Central and Eastern Europe.

    Was that worth fighting a world war – with 50 million dead?
    Mr. Buchanan is well-versed in the history of the era. So it seems that he is deliberately forgetting the main reason the U.S. entered World War II: the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. They declared war on us. We did try to stay out of the European conflict, but we eventually got drawn in. Yes, Stalin did take control of Central and Eastern Europe and that was not a good thing. Churchill and FDR needed Stalin to defeat Hitler and did the best they could at the time.

    Why destory Adolf Hitler? Hitler may have been voted into power, but he was a madman bent on the destruction of so-called inferior races and anyone who didn't agree with his plans for colonization. What our troops found when they liberated places like Auschwitz was beyond horrifying. How can anyone with a shred of decency say that stopping a the man who murdered 6 million Jews wasn't "worth it?"

    Posted on May 12, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Recycling and the Art of the Nervous Breakdown

    Think that recyling is too much bother? Too busy to sort your trash into two bags? If you lived in Kamikatsu, Japan, you might have some kind of nervous breakdown when faced with their draconian new trash-sorting laws. Two bags are for slackers! In Yokahama, trash must be sorted into 44 different categories. And properly labeled in the correct type of marker -- or else.
    When this city recently doubled the number of garbage categories to 10, it handed residents a 27-page booklet on how to sort their trash. Highlights included detailed instructions on 518 items. In Yokohama, trash that escapes recycling is put in transparent bags and loaded into trucks for incineration. Lipstick goes into burnables; lipstick tubes, "after the contents have been used up," into "small metals" or plastics. Take out your tape measure before tossing a kettle: under 12 inches, it goes into small metals, but over that it goes into bulky refuse.

    Socks? If only one, it is burnable; a pair goes into used cloth, though only if the socks "are not torn, and the left and right sock match." Throw neckties into used cloth, but only after they have been "washed and dried."

    "It was so hard at first," said Sumie Uchiki, 65, whose ward began wrestling with the 10 categories last October as part of an early trial. "We were just not used to it. I even needed to wear my reading glasses to sort out things correctly."

    To Americans struggling with sorting trash into a few categories, Japan may provide a foretaste of daily life to come. In a national drive to reduce waste and increase recycling, neighborhoods, office buildings, towns and megalopolises are raising the number of trash categories - sometimes to dizzying heights.

    Indeed, Yokohama, with 3.5 million people, appears slack compared with Kamikatsu, a town of 2,200 in the mountains of Shikoku, the smallest of Japan's four main islands. Not content with the 34 trash categories it defined four years ago as part of a major push to reduce waste, Kamikatsu has gradually raised the number to 44.
    So what's happening in Japan? Did someone with OCD get put in charge of the trash collection department? No, apparently they're simply drowning in trash and are literally running out of room to bury or burn it. The growing population in the U.S. has a price: an increasing volume of garbage. Conserving resources? Recyling trash into 44 neatly labeled categories? Trash police to monitor proper garbage disposal? Most people can barely get their taxes done and their water bill paid on time. I sense a bonanza for mental health professionals.

    Posted on May 11, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    The Aging of the 18-49 Demographic

    The L.A. Times has an interesting article about advertisers' obsession with the 18-49 year old demographic, which may be changing. The over-50 crowd is less than thrilled with all the hip new products being marketed at 18 year-olds. After all, who do they think earned the money that the 18 year-olds are spending?

    Apparently, 50 is the new 30. Today's 50 year olds are just as likely or more likely to change brands and try new things as the under 30's. And some companies, like Apple, are smart enough to have noticed.
    One of the most successful products recently to tap into that individualism has been Apple Computer Inc.'s digital music player iPod. Apple set out to market the portable device, which can hold thousands of songs, to people of all ages.

    Last fall, its TV commercials featured a silhouette of a dancing Bono of the Irish rock band U2 singing "Vertigo." Apple was confident that younger consumers would see Bono -- who turned 45 today -- as the ultimate in cool: a hardened rocker who crusades for social and environmental causes. Apple was also betting that older consumers, whose fear of technology might have made them anxious, would feel reassured. If Bono, whom they'd listened to for more than two decades, could handle an iPod, so could they.

    "We have huge youth appeal," said Greg Joswiak, Apple's vice president of iPod marketing. "With this campaign, we tried to reach across several generations."


    Posted on May 10, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Secrets of the Kingdom

    The new Huffinton Post reports on the eye-opening claims of Gerald Posner's upcoming book, Secrets of the Kingdom (Random House). Posner asserts that the entire Saudi Arabian oil empire is rigged for self-destruction; if activated, the entire infrastructure will be destroyed, leaving a radioactive mess where the world's largest oil reserves used to be.
    According to the book, which will be released to the public on May 17, based on National Security Agency electronic intercepts, the Saudi Arabian government has in place a nationwide, self-destruction explosive system composed of conventional explosives and dirty bombs strategically placed at the Kingdom's key oil ports, pipelines, pumping stations, storage tanks, offshore platforms, and backup facilities. If activated, the bombs would destroy the infrastructure of the world's largest oil supplier, and leave the country a contaminated nuclear wasteland ensuring that the Kingdom's oil would be unusable to anyone. The NSA file is dubbed internally Petro SE, for petroleum scorched earth.

    To make certain that the damaged facilities cannot be rebuilt, the Saudis have deployed crude Radioactive Dispersal Devices (RDDs) throughout the Kingdom. Built covertly over several years, these dirty bombs are in place at -- among other locations -- all eight of the Kingdom's refineries, sections of the world's largest oil field at Ghawar, and at three of the ten indispensable processing towers at the largest-ever processing complex at Abqaiq.
    Why would the Saudis do such a thing? Well, supposedly they want to make sure the U.S. will support them in the event of a revolution. And we certainly do support them.

    Meanwhile, President Bush is irritating President Putin by talking about how great Georgian democracy is and how we can't abide dictators of any kind. Unless, of course, they have our oil supply rigged for self-destruct.

    Posted on May 9, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Tony Blair Set for Third Term

    Labour lost quite a few seats in the election, but hung onto power, giving Tony Blair a third term as Prime Minister.
    Tony Blair promised today to pursue the people's priorities in Labour's unprecedented third term and issued a veiled apology for the shortcomings of the past eight years, as he returned to Downing Street with a much-reduced majority. Standing in front of No 10, Mr Blair acknowledged that Iraq had been a "deeply divisive issue", but said he believed the country was now ready to move on.

    He also drew a sharp contrast between the mobbed scenes of triumph in his 1997 victory and today's humble acceptance.
    Labour now has a 60 seat majority in Parliament, down from their 165 seat majority in 2001. The Iraq War was the main reason for Labour's less than stellar results in the election and several pro-Blair MP's lost their seats to the anti-war Liberal Democrats. Blair is no fool; he knows he won by the skin of his teeth, and has been quite humble in his victory speeches. To win, Blair had to do all sorts of unpalatable things. He was a guest on a women's show, where he had to field angry questions about the war from citizens. He was clearly unhappy about it, but managed to muddle through it with most of his dignity still intact. He's come as close to an apology for the WMD fiasco as any politician has anywhere in the world.

    George Bush reportedly offered to campaign for Blair, or at least make a speech for him, but Blair declined. Instead, Bill Clinton appeared via satellite to rouse British voters. And that strategy appears to have paid off.

    Posted on May 6, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Security Concerns Scuttle Freedom Tower

    The New York Post reports that New York Governor Pataki has scuttled the plans for the Freedom Tower at Ground Zero due to security concerns over the design. You remember the Freedom Tower? The endless competition and arguing over what should be built on the site of the World Trade Towers that were destroyed on 9/11? The one with the hideous memorial to 9/11 victims, that looked like the victims were being flushed down a giant toilet in the ground? Well, after all the hoopla it appears that someone forgot to make sure that the architects met with security consultants and engineers before they submitted their work.
    The Freedom Tower will remain in the same northwest corner of the World Trade Center site overlooking West Street, but it will be moved slightly away from the street to better protect it from potential car bombs. Another expected design change involves the lower 150 to 200 feet of the tower, now largely glass, that will have to be better protected.

    Libeskind yesterday seemed resigned to the changes. "Security is clearly the paramount concern," he said. "While the shape and details of buildings may change, the intent, spirit and direction of the master plan remains intact." Any tension between City Hall and Albany about improved security was downplayed. At a town a town-hall meeting in Brooklyn last night, Bloomberg said, "We made some major progress today in terms of satisfying the demands of the Police Department that this building be really safe."

    Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, whose district includes Ground Zero, blasted both Pataki and Bloomberg. "The lack of coordination and cooperation by the governor and the mayor has cost us months of delay and resulted in the decision by Goldman Sachs to consider other locations for their headquarters," he fumed. Goldman Sachs had proposed a massive headquarters across West Street from the Freedom Tower site, but pulled out recently over concerns about security.
    This entire project has been a disaster from the get-go. And now they figure out that it's not safe? Let's hope that one of the changes is to get rid of the appalling "flush the victims down the drain" part of the design.

    Posted on May 5, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Bush Apologizes to the Italians, Again

    The Associate Press reports that President Bush had been forced to apologize once again for the accidental shooting death of the Italian government agent Nicola Calipari in Iraq during his rescue of kidnapped Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena.
    President Bush called Premier Silvio Berlusconi on Wednesday to express his regret for the March killing of an Italian agent by U.S. troops in Iraq. The call came days after Washington and Rome issued rival reports about the shooting death.

    Berlusconi's office described the conversation as "long and cordial" and said the two countries reaffirmed their commitment in Iraq. Berlusconi, a staunch ally of the United States, sent about 3,000 troops in Iraq after the ouster of Saddam Hussein.

    But the March 4 death of Nicola Calipari, hailed as a hero in Italy, has caused friction between Washington and Rome, and Berlusconi's government has come under pressure to reevaluate the Italian troop deployment in Iraq.
    The U.S. investigation of the incident clears U.S. troops of any wrongdoing, despite the conspiracy theories that have been floated. The Italian investigation also found that the shooting was an accident, but did not absolve American troops of wrongdoing, noting that the troops were inexperienced, exhausted and prone to errors. The American report claimed that the car was speeding and that a checkpoint was clearly marked. But the Italian reports says differently:
    Italian government:
    -No warning signs to motorists about impending checkpoint
    -Car not speeding and did not accelerate after warning shots
    -Proper inquiry impossible because vehicles removed and army logs destroyed just after shooting
    This is a minor incident in America. But this is a cause celebre in Italy, where the newspapers are hurling accusations of lies and coverups at the U.S. It's hard to see how we would benefit from taking out a member of the Italian secret service and wounding a communist journalist. And there has been quite a bit of negative blowback with a major ally. It's all most peculiar.

    Posted on May 4, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    General Myers Says Iraq Hurting Military's Readiness to Invade Someone Else

    CNN reports that the majority of Americans believe that the Iraq War wasn't worth it.
    Fifty-seven percent of those polled said they did not believe it was worth going to war, versus 41 percent who said it was, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll of 1,006 adults.

    That was a drop in support from February, when 48 percent said it was worth going to war and half said it was not. It's also the highest percentage of respondents who have expressed those feelings and triple the percentage of Americans who said that it was not worth the cost shortly after the war began about two years ago.

    Asked how things are going for the United States in Iraq, 56 percent said "badly" or "very badly," up from 45 percent in March. Forty-two percent said "well" or "very well," down from 52 percent in March.
    Meanwhile, the Pentagon says that the Iraq War is hurting the military's ability to recruit new troops and hindering its ability to repond to any other armed conflict that may arise. (cough, North Korea, cough, Iran)
    The concentration of American troops and weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan limits the Pentagon's ability to deal with other potential armed conflicts, the military's highest ranking officer reported to Congress on Monday.

    The officer, Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, informed Congress in a classified report that major combat operations elsewhere in the world, should they be necessary, would probably be more protracted and produce higher American and foreign civilian casualties because of the commitment of Pentagon resources in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Yes, its funny how blown up soldiers on the news tends to lower the number of young people clamoring to go into the military.

    Posted on May 3, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Laura Bush Shows Flair For Comedy

    Laura Bush's speech at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner Saturday night was a big hit. Her timing and delivery were perfect as she gently teased the president, in the tradition of the event.
    Ladies and gentlemen, I've been attending these dinners for years and just quietly sitting there. Well, I've got a few things I want to say for a change.

    This is going to be fun because he really doesn't have a clue about what I'm gonna' to say next. George always says he's delighted to come to these press dinners. Baloney. He's usually in bed by now.

    I'm not kidding.

    I said to him the other day, "George, if you really want to end tyranny in the world, you're going to have to stay up later."

    I am married to the president of the United States, and here's our typical evening: Nine o'clock, Mr. Excitement here is sound asleep, and I'm watching Desperate Housewives— with Lynne Cheney. Ladies and gentlemen, I am a desperate housewife. I mean, if those women on that show think they're desperate, they oughta be with George.

    One night, after George went to bed, Lynne Cheney, Condi Rice, Karen Hughes and I went to Chippendale's. I wouldn't even mention it except Ruth Ginsberg and Sandra Day O'Connor saw us there. I won't tell you what happened, but Lynne's Secret Service codename is now "Dollar Bill."

    But George and I are complete opposites — I'm quiet, he's talkative, I'm introverted, he's extroverted, I can pronounce nuclear —
    The president's poll numbers are sinking like lead weights in water, so Rove pulls out Laura Bush. She's popular and makes the president seem like a good sport, and the public loved it. And that's smart politics.

    Posted on May 2, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Our Blogs

    Bloggers Blog
    Book Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write News
    Writer's Blog


    Text Ads




    www.mediacynic.com
    Copyright © 2003-2007 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.