MediaCynic.com

Archives
Homepage
Linking to Us
Recent Headlines




Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator



Add to Pluck



Categories

2008 Election
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Economy
John Edwards
Entertainment
Environment
Al Gore
Health Care
Immigration
International
Iraq
John Kerry
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Plamegate
Politics
Polls
Religion
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Scandals
Science
Social security
Supreme Court
Taxes
Technology




March, 2005 Archives


Where Have All the Resources Gone?

In a macabre counterpoint to the ANWR drilling disaster, The Guardian reports thattwo-thirds of world's resources are used up.
The human race is living beyond its means. A report backed by 1,360 scientists from 95 countries--some of them world leaders in their fields--today warns that the almost two-thirds of the natural machinery that supports life on Earth is being degraded by human pressure.

The study contains what its authors call "a stark warning" for the entire world. The wetlands, forests, savannahs, estuaries, coastal fisheries and other habitats that recycle air, water and nutrients for all living creatures are being irretrievably damaged. In effect, one species is now a hazard to the other 10 million or so on the planet, and to itself.

"Human activity is putting such a strain on the natural functions of Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted," it says.
So, to sum up: we've got too many people who are using up all the fresh water, we're destroying the forests which are the lungs of the planet, we're overfishing the oceans when we're not dumping toxic waste in them and--oh yeah-- a year or so ago the Pentagon issued a report saying that global warming was a greater danger to Americans than terrorism.

In the 70's people used to talk about population control. But that's a non-starter in today's America, where there's a growing movement by pharmacists to refuse to give women their lawfully-prescribed birth control prescriptions. A number of states actually are passing so-called "conscience laws" that allow pharmacists to refuse women access to their prescriptions that offend the pharmacist's moral or religious beliefs. So much for women's rights.

Posted on March 30, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Can 59 Ex-U.S. Diplomats Be Wrong?

As John "Hater of All Things U.N." Bolton lurches towards his confirmation as our next Ambassador to the United Nations, some American diplomats are mounting a last-ditch effort to stop the Bolton Confirmation Train from reaching its destination. For Bolton to be confirmed, he must receive a majority vote from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which has 10 Republicans and 8 Democrats. These 59 ex-U.S. diplomats wrote a letter to the Seator Lugar, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, declaring that Bolton "is the wrong man for this position." The letter lists a number of Bolton's sins committed in his current job as the State Department's senior arms control official. The letter says that Bolton has consistently opposed U.S. efforts to improve national security through arms control.

The Associated Press reports that the letter's signatories include Arthur Hartman, the ambassador to France and the Soviet Union under Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan and assistant secretary of state for European affairs under President Richard M. Nixon, James Leonard, the deputy ambassador to the U.N. under Carter and Gerald Ford; Princeton Lyman, ambassador to South Africa and Nigeria under Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton; and Monteagle Stearns, ambassador to Greece and Ivory Coast in the Ford, Carter and Reagan administrations.

According to CNN,
They ticked off a number of treaties they said Bolton had opposed and said he had made "unsubstantiated claims" that Cuba and Syria were working on biological weapons.

Also, they said, Bolton once worked as a paid researcher for Taiwan and supported recognition of it as a sovereign state, and he was skeptical of U.N. peacekeeping operations.

"Given these past actions and statements, John R. Bolton cannot be an effective promoter of the U.S. national interest at the U.N.," the former diplomats concluded. "We urge you to oppose his nomination."
On April 7th, Bolton will be hauled in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for what will no doubt be a gigantic farce in which Bolton will be lauded as the perfect man to be our chief diplomat to the UN. Be sure to tune in.

Posted on March 29, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.




Upgrading the Army

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have demonstrated how badly our armed forces are in need of a major upgrade. The problem is that it's going to cost so much to whip the Army into a high-tech fighting force that even hawkish Republicans in Congress are blanching at the price tag. The first phase of the complex restructuring will be called Future Combat Systems (sounds like a new XBox title, doesn't it?) will cost $145 billion. The New York Times reports:
That price tag, larger than past estimates publicly disclosed by the Army, does not include a projected $25 billion for the communications network needed to connect the future forces. Nor does it fully account for Army plans to provide Future Combat weapons and technologies to forces beyond those first 15 brigades.

The Army is asking Congress to approve Future Combat while it is fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan whose costs, according to the Congressional Research Service, now exceed $275 billion. Future Combat is one of the biggest items in the Pentagon's plans to build more than 70 major weapons systems at a cost of more than $1.3 trillion.
That giant sucking sound you hear is fiscal conservatives trying to speak in outrage and failing miserably. Say it with me now, "$1.3 trillion dollars." But, as always, we can rely on Donald Rumsfeld to put things in perspective for us. Last month, he testified at the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee about the joys of fighting two wars and trying to completely restructure the Army at the same time.
"Abraham Lincoln once compared reorganizing the Union Army during the Civil War to bailing out the Potomac River with a teaspoon," he said. "I hope and trust that what we are proposing to accomplish will not be that difficult."


Posted on March 28, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Kay Bailey Hutchison Being Stalked by Texas Governor?

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) is expected to give up her U.S. Senate seat in 2006 in order to run for governor of Texas. Of course, Governor Rick Perry (R) is less than thrilled about those plans, as he has no intention of moving out of the governor's mansion any time soon. Now, Senator Hutchison's aides have accused Perry of stalking the senator, and it appears to be true. The governor admitted that he paid $2000 to film Senator Hutchison--horror of all horrors--hugging Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton after Clinton introduced her at speaking engagement March 3rd at the Sewall-Belmont House and Museum, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Senator Clinton actually engaged in complimentary pleasantries in her introduction of Senator Hutchison. An edited, 46 second clip of the moment has been winding its way around the Internet, apparently to reveal that Kay Bailey Hutchison....mmmm, not sure what it's supposed to show exactly. That she has good manners? That she can be civil to a fellow Democratic Senator in public? With two high-profile Republicans duking it out in the primary and Kinky Friedman trying to get on the ballot as an Independent (it's never happened in Texas--ever), this is shaping up to be one wild governor's race.

Posted on March 24, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


John Edwards Embraces Podcasting

Former Democratic Vice-presidential nominee John Edwards is embracing the new podcasting technology, with his first podcast scheduled for tomorrow (Wednesday, March 23, 2005). So what is a podcast, you might ask? Basically, it's a free download of someone speaking. I like to think of it as Tivo-ing a favorite radio show. Basically, you just install either the free iPodder or Dopper software, then download the MP3 file and hit Play. Senator Edwards has a handy FAQ for the podcast-impaired. You can also submit a question for Senator Edwards on the FAQ page. Podcasting is like radio without the federal government regulation--so far, at least. Naturally, anyone with a great speaking voice will do very well with podcasts. John Edwards has such a reassuring, upbeat, yet soothing voice that his broadcast would probably be a handy file to pull up in a stressful moment. Hey, I just thought of a great fundraiser. Perhaps for a donation to his favorite charity, he'd podcast you a personal and inspiring message. Or, if you're more of a Neocon, you could get Senator Bill Frist to record a message where he provides you a medical diagnosis of a relative whose photo you emailed to his secretary. I wonder how that would fit into the McCain-Feingold rules?

Posted on March 22, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.




Conservative Women Score Big: Ken Mehlman Officially Not Gay

Whew, that's a relief! Raw Story gives us the early scoop on a GQ cover story about gay Republicans, the gay mafia, the outing of gay-bashing, gay Republicans in or out of Bush's inner circle, or something like that. But the best part of the article is the fabulous news for the ladies: smooth-talking, single, 38 year-old Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman is officially not gay! After refusing to take reporters' many questions about his sexual orientation and all that unkind Beltway gossip about his being a fellow traveler, finally we get the definitive word about his datability.
"Ken Mehlman is not gay," Steve Schmidt, a senior official of the Bush campaign and a friend of Mehlman?s told Jake Tapper, an ABC News correspondent who wrote the piece for the magazine.
James Dobson will be so relieved.

Posted on March 18, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.


Terrible Troika Set to Terrify Old Europe

  • President Bush named Paul Wolfowitz to head up the World Bank. You remember Wolfie? He's the one who said that the Iraq War will be paid for by Iraqi oil reserves and that it would be silly to think that we'd need more troops to win the peace than to win the war. Oh yes, and he hates Old Europe. Sounds like the perfect guy for the job. But that's only the beginning of the reign of the Terrible Troika. With Wolfie at the World Bank doling out money to poor people, Karen Hughes on a mission to improve our image in the Muslim world and John "The UN Totally Sucks" Bolton as our new ambassador to the United Nations, 2005 is set to be one of Old Europe's most miserable years--diplomatically speaking. Never let it be said that Karl Rove doesn't have a sense of humor.
  • Good news for the dwindling Social Security trust fund: rising obesity rates are going to cut 2-5 years off people's lives.
  • President Bush winked at Maureen Dowd at the Gridiron Dinner in Washington on Saturday: "not a flirty wink but a mischievous Clark Gable 'I've got your number and you think you've got mine but I win' wink." That's a lot of information to glean from a wink.

    Posted on March 17, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


  • Harry Reid to Frist: Go Nuclear and We'll Shut Down the Senate

    The imminent battle over filibusters and Bush's judicial nominations is heating up. Yesterday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid took his strongest position yet on Senator Frist's threat of "going nuclear." The so-called "nuclear option", e.g., obtaining a parliamentary ruling declaring that filibusters are unconstitutional. That ruling would change the fact that it actually takes 60 votes to get any legislation passed in the Senate. That extreme option has never been exercised by either party, because the potential for blowback is horrific. Most senators realize that times change and that one day their party may need the filibuster option.

    Although they have actually approved most of President Bush's judicial nominations, Senator Frist is furious that ten judges couldn't get a floor vote. But Democrats say that those ten are so radical, so extremely conservative, that they must not be permitted to be appointed to a bench for life. And I have to agree. Nominee William G. Myers, for example, has stated his hostility to the right to privacy (on which the right to birth control is based), any environmental laws, free speech and equal protection. It gets better. He has almost no litigation experience and more than one third of the panel of the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary rejected him as "unqualified" for the bench.

    Minority Leader Reid and the Democratic senators showed up on the Capitol steps yesterday to introduce a two-page letter Reid wrote to Frist which said that if Republicans go forward with the nuclear option,
    "the majority should not expect to receive cooperation from the minority in the conduct of Senate business." He said Democrats would cooperate on legislation "supporting our troops" and keeping the government running, but otherwise would refuse to facilitate actions "even on routine matters."
    In other words: at his signal, Unleash Hell. Harry Reid is certainly displaying some hidden depths, I must say. More power to him.

    Posted on March 16, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.




    Senate Votes to Allow Drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

    Well, this certainly has been a busy news day. The Senate voted 51-49 to allow drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge, despite efforts by John Kerry, John McCain, Democrats and moderate Republicans' efforts to stop the measure being attached to the current budget bill. So, if the budget passes congress, there will be drilling by the end of the year--something that the oil companies have been campaigning for for twenty years now. Even they admit that the oil found will have no effect on current prices or supplies, since it will be at least ten years before we see one drop of oil. Of course, ANWR will be destroyed by then. Anyone who says differently has never seen a major oilfield up close during and after production, and doesn't know a thing about the oil business.

    Posted on March 16, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    When It Comes to Social Security, Gridlock is a Beautiful Thing

    David Brooks takes a shot at analyzing the status of the current Social Security debate and gets it really wrong. Brooks starts out by saying that there is only a one in four chance that Social Security reform will happen this year. Fair enough; the polls show that only around 37% of Americans are buying into the idea of privatizing social security. He then tries to explain where both the Republicans and Democrats went wrong. He says that the Republicans underestimated Americans' love for the social security program and their willingness to take a cut in benefits. So far, so accurate. But where he goes terribly wrong is in saying that the Democrats and moderate Republicans who have opposed privatization at all costs are making a mistake by not meeting the privatization folks halfway. For the first time in a long time, Democrats are totally united against this absurd proposal to privatize Social Security, which even President Bush admits will not make the program fiscally sound. When a proposal is morally, ethically and logically wrong, you do not compromise. You say "No."

    Put simply, there is no Social Security crisis. A few adjustments need to be made because our population is aging. Today, even Alan Greenspan said that it's not a complicated fix. He suggested--hold on to your hats folks--that we put the Social Security monies in a Lock Box, and stop co-mingling it with other funds. (Al Gore probably fell out of his chair when he heard Greenspan put forth this sensible idea from his 2000 presidential campaign.) Second, if we didn't have such a horrendous deficit from a war that was supposed to be paid for by Iraqi oil revenues (remember that promise?), the cost of the risky social experiment of private accounts wouldn't require us to borrow trillions of dollars from the Chinese. Third, Greenspan said today that raising the retirement age by even one year would have a tremendous positive impact.

    Brooks says,
    If Social Security reform fails--and obviously I hope this obit becomes obsolete--it will be many years before any sort of big entitlement reform will come up again. The parties will keep playing chicken, and we will soon find ourselves catastrophically buried under our own debt.
    He makes it sound like Social Security is the reason for the current deficit, which is absurd. This so-called "reform movement" is anything but that. This is a movement to dismantle the New Deal and wean Americans off a retirement plan that is funded by taxpayers. That is a fundamental policy shift embracing the idea that each person is responsible for his own retirement and that the government does not need to provide a safety net for the elderly and infirm. Although I personally find that position to be unethical, morally bankrupt and quite impractical (even the most libertarian among us probably doesn't want to trip over homeless elderly people eating cat food while on the way to Nordstrom's), it is a recognized--if unpopular--political position to take. So, let the privatizers stand up and tell the American people what they're really trying to do to Social Security: destroy it, starting with small, incremental steps. And when they tell the truth, the American people will see that, sometimes, gridlock can be a beautiful thing.

    Posted on March 15, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Alan Greenspan and the Relaxing Bubblebath

    Now, here's something you don't hear about everyday. Rush & Molloy report on a GQ article about Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.
    Alan Greenspan doesn't turn to his wife, NBC News correspondent Andrea Mitchell, when he needs inspiration for a speech. Instead, GQ reports, the tight-lipped Fed chairman "heads straight to the bathroom, turns on a large fan to create a blast of white noise that blocks out sound, draws a hot bath, strips off his clothes and settles into the water for at least an hour and sometimes two."
    Sorry for the mid-afternoon mental picture jolt. I didn't want any of you falling asleep at work.

    Posted on March 14, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Condi Denies She Has Presidential Ambitions

    Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice caused such a furor last week when she wouldn't rule out a presidential bid in 2008, that she had to make the rounds of the Sunday talk shows yesterday to put out the fires. In her own words, she said: "I don't have any desire to run for president. I don't intend to. I won't do it....I won't. How's that? Is that categorical enough?" That was on ABC. On Meet the Press she said, "I will not run for president of the United States. How is that? I don't know how many ways to say 'no' in this town." On CBS' Face the Nation, she said "I don't think I even ran for class president at any point. I love being secretary of State thus far. I liked being national security advisor. And one of these days very soon I'm going to want to return and be an academic again and get back to the California life and to the world of ideas." So, there you have it. She's not running--this week, at least.

    Posted on March 14, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Ex-marine: Saddam's Capture Was Staged

    Well, here's an interesting little story. One of the Marines involved in Saddam Hussein's capture says the whole thing was a fake, that Saddam was found in a house, not a spider hole. In fact, he says there was no spider hole at all, just a well on the property. He also says Saddam put up a defense and shot at U.S. troops out of a window. The UPI reports:
    Ex-Sgt. Nadim Abou Rabeh, of Lebanese descent, was quoted in the Saudi daily al-Medina Wednesday as saying Saddam was actually captured Friday, Dec. 12, 2003, and not the day after, as announced by the U.S. Army.

    "I was among the 20-man unit, including eight of Arab descent, who searched for Saddam for three days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and we found him in a modest home in a small village and not in a hole as announced," Abou Rabeh said.

    "We captured him after fierce resistance during which a Marine of Sudanese origin was killed," he said. "Later on, a military production team fabricated the film of Saddam's capture in a hole, which was in fact a deserted well," Abou Rabeh said.
    My first reaction is, who exactly is this Ex-Sgt. Nadim Abou Rabeh? Why is he giving interviews in Lebanon? Has anyone talked to the rest of the soldiers in his ex-unit? Certainly the ex-Marine's statements make Saddam seem more heroic to the Arab world, which was very unhappy with Saddam's poor defense when the U.S. invaded Iraq. On the other hand, did the U.S. deliberately falsify this information? I think this needs to be looked into. But it probably won't be.

    Posted on March 10, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Hezbollah Leads 500,000 in Peaceful Demostration

    The Associated Press reports that in Lebanon today approximately 500,000 people peacefully protested in support of Syria. The demonstration was organized by Hezbollah, which is very popular in Lebanon but has been labeled a terrorist organization by the United States. Sheik Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, has sat quietly on the sidelines recently, but he's clearly making his move.
    Sheik Nasrallah apologized to Syria for the anti-Syrian protests and announced: "We reject the Resolution 1559," a reference to the UN resolution that demands the complete withdrawal of Syria's 14,000 troops in Lebanon and calls for dismantling militias.

    There were no independent estimates of the crowds, but at least 500,000 people crowded the square and nearby streets. Many more were still coming, answering his call to demonstrate against U.S.-led intervention and counter weeks of massive anti-Syrian rallies.... Countering the "Syria out!" cries shouted daily by the anti-Syrian protesters, Tuesday's crowd chanted, "Beirut is free! America get out!"

    The UPI had some reports that thousands of Syrians had crossed the border to join in the demonstration, but that hasn't been verified. It seems that at least several hundred thousand Lebanese would like Syria to stick around. The demonstration was remarkably peaceful, but the question is: how long will it remain peaceful? And if another civil war breaks out, what will the White House do? It's hard to see any tactical advantage to us getting bogged down in Beirut -- again.

    Posted on March 8, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Clinton Camps on Floor; Gives Bush 41 the Bed

    The March 14th Newsweek issue shares an interesting item it learned from President Bush, Sr. about the sleeping arrangements on the plane Bush, Sr. and former president Bill Clinton shared on their tour of tsunami damage in Southeast Asia. According to the Associated Press via CNN:
    The government plane in which the presidents toured the disaster area had one large bedroom and another room with tables and seats, according to an interview with Bush in this week's Newsweek.

    Bush, 80, said Clinton offered ahead of time to give the older former president the bedroom so he could lie flat and avoid paining his body. Clinton, 58, decided to play cards in the other room that night.

    The next morning, Bush said he peeked in and saw Clinton sound asleep on the plane's floor.

    "We could have switched places, each getting half a night on the bed, but he deferred to me. That was a very courteous thing, very thoughtful, and that meant a great deal to me," Bush said.

    Bush said he and Clinton are not close, but have been compatible on the tour, partly because Clinton respects his age.
    Well, one thing President Clinton has never been accused of is having bad manners.

    Posted on March 7, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Lebanon Complications: Don't Forget Hezbollah

    The addition of Saudi Arabia to the list of countries that has called upon Syria to finally withdraw its troops from Lebanon is significant; it seems that Syria will do just that, starting Monday. But what is going to happen when they do leave? Will democracy really break out? Will the new government love or hate America? It's hard to tell, especially when no one knows what arguably the most powerful faction in the country--Hezbollah--is going to do. Mitchell Prothero has an excellent article in Salon today, entitled "Lebanon's X factor: Hezbollah", which clearly lays out the recent history of Lebanon, Syria and Israel and why the situation is a lot more complicated than cursory news reports make it out to be, especially since the 900 pound gorilla in the Lebanese political room, Hezbollah, has sat this fight out and is just waiting its turn to arm wrestle for power.
    For all of its power, however, Hezbollah remains heavily funded by and deeply tied to Iran and Syria, which employ it as a key proxy force in their fight against Israel. (Syria is loath to give up this strategic military asset as long as its long-standing demand that Israel return the Golan Heights, seized in the 1967 war, has not been resolved.) Accordingly, Hezbollah immediately condemned last year's United Nations Resolution 1559, which demands Syrian withdrawal and the disarming of Hezbollah's very potent military force. France joined the United States in supporting 1559, but it has broken with Washington over U.S. demands that Europe place Hezbollah on the list of terrorist groups.

    While Hezbollah's leader, Sayeed Sheik Nasrallah, ordered the group to remain neutral in the political struggle since Hariri's death and has refused to make public statements, the role of Hezbollah, its militia and the larger struggle against Israel pose a huge and complicated problem for the opposition, which has yet to display a coherent policy toward the group and the questions that will have to be answered.
    This all makes for a very tricky diplomatic sitation, to say the least. An emboldened Shiite fundamentalist regime with heavy ties to Iran is not in America's best interests. Lebanon is an unusual Middle East country with its large Christian population, which made up at least half the country when the French left in 1932. Now, they make up approximately 30% of the population, the rest being Muslim, both Sunni and Shia.

    The Lebanese constitution requires that power be shared between a Christian president, a Sunni prime minister, and a Shiite speaker of the Assembly. After the last civil war, the powers of the president were substantially reduced while the power of the National Assembly was increased. To assume that these diverse groups can quickly form a stable democratic government after the May elections seems somewhat overly optimistic. But it would certainly be nice.

    Posted on March 6, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Porter Goss: Dazed and Confused

    An alarming Associated Press article shares the disturbing news that our CIA head, Porter Goss, is about to crack under the strain of his demanding new job. Here's an excerpt from the article:
    "The jobs I'm being asked to do, the five hats that I wear, are too much for this mortal," Goss said. "I'm a little amazed at the workload."

    Goss praised Bush's choice for the new job of national intelligence director, John Negroponte. The career diplomat, who is expected to be confirmed by the Senate, will take over several of the duties currently assigned to Goss, including the presidential briefing.

    Goss, who has made few public comments beyond congressional testimony, also said the legislation creating the position of director of national intelligence left him unclear on his future role.

    "It's got a huge amount of ambiguity in it," he said. "I don't know by law what my direct relationship is with John Negroponte," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld or other top officials involved with intelligence.

    Despite the confusion, Goss praised Negroponte's selection.
    So, to summarize: he hates having to work so hard, he doesn't have a clue whether he, Negroponte, Rumsfield or some other official is really in charge of our intelligence services, and isn't sure what he's supposed to do when Negroponte comes onboard as the new Director of National Intelligence. Well, props to Goss for the honesty, but geez....shouldn't somebody do something about his concerns?

    Posted on March 3, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Credit Card Companies Demand Their Pound of Flesh

    It looks like the credit card companies are about to get their fondest wish: a total revamping of the federal bankrupcty code with some of the most anti-consumer, Draconian provisions ever seen in an American statute. The bankruptcy code does not need reforming. It works just fine, if you talk to anyone who actually knows anything about the subject -- like federal bankruptcy judges, for example. A recent Harvard University study showed that one half of all bankruptcies are filed because of overwhelming medical bills -- not because someone was irresponsible with his money. The study showed that most middle class families with insurance are just one illness away from bankruptcy court.

    Bankruptcy is not some fabulous treat, no matter what Rick Santorum says. It's a devastating mark on one's credit record that stays there for ten long years. Now, this new bill will make it almost impossible to file for Chapter 7 (the one where you get a fresh start at a high price on your credit report), will effectively eliminate the homestead exemption, sharply curtail consumers' ability to hire an attorney to represent them, and will force many people into Chapter 13 (the one where you pay and pay over time while a judge decides how much you can spend on your kid's medical bills each month) who have no business being there. This bill has been shot down many times since 1997, but the credit card companies keep pouring money into politicians' coffers -- and now it's payback time. With the threat of bankruptcy effectively removed, look for the credit card companies to raise rates, fees and penalties (already at around 31% for anyone who's lost a job and is behind on any payments) to levels not seen outside of a Mafia movie. The Puritans believed that lending money at interest was a sin; debtor's prison was one institution they left behind in England when they came to America. It looks like debtor's prison is about to make a comeback. And the credit card companies will get their pound of flesh.

    Posted on March 2, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Republican Senators Waffling on Social Security Privatization

    USA Today reports some bad news for President Bush: the latest USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll conducted Friday-Sunday found that a paltry 35% of Americans approve of Bush's Social Security record, 56% disapprove and 9% have no opinion. After a week of hearing angry seniors gripe at them during town hall meetings, many Republican Senators have returned to Washington less than thrilled with the whole privatization thing. Senator Frist (who has apparently learned a thing or two about how to handle the unruly Senate) threw the whole issue squarely back in Bush's lap. "The president will have to stay out there and lead on it, when a lot of political figures want to run and hide and when you have a lot of people who say there's no problem." At least he recognizes that many people (read: economists and the majority of Americans) heard the president loud and clear when he admitted that private accounts will not improve the financial situation of social security. Frist may have thrown the hot potato back to Bush, but the president has a problem: the more he talks, the more people are opposed to his plan. Or, as Senator Chuck Schumer quipped; "In two months, the president has created a firestorm against [his own plan]." The Gallup Poll had some more bad news for Bush: his favorable rating is at 56%, but the AARP's favorable rating is at 75%.

    Posted on March 1, 2005
    Permanent link to this entry.


    Our Blogs

    Bloggers Blog
    Book Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write News
    Writer's Blog


    Text Ads




    www.mediacynic.com
    Copyright © 2003-2007 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.