MediaCynic.com

Archives
Homepage
Linking to Us
Recent Headlines




Add to MyYahoo

Add to MyMSN

Add to Bloglines

Add to NewsGator

Add to Pluck





Categories

2008 Election
George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Economy
John Edwards
Entertainment
Environment
Al Gore
Health Care
Immigration
International
Iraq
John Kerry
Media
Middle East
Miscellaneous
Plamegate
Politics
Polls
Religion
Condoleezza Rice
Donald Rumsfeld
Scandals
Science
Social security
Supreme Court
Taxes
Technology






MediaCynic.com Homepage | Immigration

Kay Bailey Hutchison Stays Strong

Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) is refusing to bow to pressure from the Bush administration to vote to bring the senate amnesty bill to the floor for a full senate vote. They have been lobbying her hard, but she is standing firm, announcing that she cannot support the bill in its current incarnation. Senator Cornyn of Texas is also refusing to support the bill.
U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, who has been under intense pressure from the White House and Republican leadership to support a sweeping immigration overhaul, nevertheless announced today that she will vote against reviving the legislation when it returns to the Senate floor next week.

She was joined today by the state's other senator, Republican John Cornyn, who had been expected by the bill's supporters to take such a stance. They had aggressively lobbied Hutchison in hopes of adding her vote to the 60 necessary to revive the stalled legislation. "I could not support (bringing the bill to a vote) in its present position," Hutchison, criticizing the legislation as amnesty for illegal immigrants, said today.

As No. 4 in the Senate GOP leadership, Hutchison is the highest-ranking Republican to break from her party on a domestic policy issue of signal importance to President Bush. "Until major changes are made that reject amnesty and a more open, fair process emerges for debating one of the most crucial issues facing our nation, I cannot support this immigration bill," she said.

*****

The architects of the tenuous bipartisan immigration compromise, which twins increased border and interior enforcement with a path to eventual citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants, had given Hutchison a chance to propose an amendment in hopes of securing her support. But Hutchison acknowledged that her amendment, which would require most adult illegal immigrants to temporarily return home within two years of obtaining their visa, was unlikely to succeed.
Kudos to Senator Hutchison for bravely refusing to cave in to what is being reported as extreme pressure from the White House on this issue. Because we all know what happens to Republicans who aren't deemed "Bushy" enough. And it's not pretty.

Posted on June 21, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Legal Immigrants Face Years of Delays

The Washington Post reports on the shocking backlog at the U.S. Immigration Service. Hundreds of thousands of immigrants who have applied legally for citizenship have been stuck in limbo for years because of the lack of personnel, computers and funding to carry out required background checks.
Since 2005, the backlog of legal U.S. immigrants whose applications for naturalization and other benefits are stuck on hold awaiting FBI name checks has doubled to 329,160, prompting a flood of lawsuits in federal courts, bureaucratic finger-pointing in Washington and tough scrutiny by 2008 presidential candidates.

At a time when Congress is intensely focused on border security, the growing backlog is one of the most visible signs of the U.S. immigration system's breakdown, current and former government officials said.

Unexplained delays in determining whether longtime residents pose a threat promise neither justice to the applicants nor added security to the country, they said. They blame bureaucratic mismanagement and poor coordination at the FBI and the immigration service, and the inefficient methods of screening files for genuine security threats.

In his annual report to Congress last week, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) ombudsman Prakash I. Khatri called the backlog of FBI name checks "unacceptable from the standpoint of national security and immigration benefits processing."

*****

Seong Ho Kang, 40, a computer engineer from South Korea who lives in Centreville, has waited for more than a year for his FBI check, possibly because the bureau since 2001 has intensified the scrutiny of immigrants with high-technology backgrounds. In frustration, Kang submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for any records the FBI might have on him. The bureau promptly replied that it had none. "If they can tell that to me, why can't they tell it to immigration?" Kang asked.
The article cites several specific cases of of persons who have had their lives put on hold for years, even though they have been long-time U.S. residents with jobs and stable backgrounds. These people applied legally to come to this country and deserve to have their cases decided before we even begin to think about dealing with those that broke the law to come to the U.S. The U.S. immigration system is broken: it has outdated computers and insufficient personnel to do an overwhelming job. It must be fixed before any immigration legislation is considered.

Posted on June 18, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Amnesty Bill Not Dead Yet

Just when I was sighing with relief that the ill-conceived, poorly designed, nonsensical Ted Kennedy - John McCain amnesty bill had died a deserved death on the Senate Floor, it appears that it's about to be resurrected. Like a zombie from a B horror movie, this monster simply will not die.
Senate leaders announced plans Thursday night to revive the White House-backed measure as early as next week, although neither Majority Leader Harry Reid nor his GOP counterpart, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, issued any predictions the bill ultimately would pass.

Instead, they issued a statement that said in its entirety: "We met this evening with several of the senators involved in the immigration bill negotiations. Based on that discussion, the immigration bill will return to the Senate floor after completion" of sweeping energy legislation that has occupied the Senate this week.

There was no immediate reaction from the bill's numerous Senate critics, who have consistently attacked the legislation as conferring amnesty on the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants living in the country. At the White House, spokesman Scott Stanzel said, "We are encouraged by the announcement from Senate leaders that comprehensive immigration reform will be brought back up for consideration."

The immigration legislation's revival represented at least an interim victory for President Bush, who returned home from Europe earlier in the week and plunged into a campaign to rescue his top domestic priority. On Tuesday, the president made a rare visit to the Capitol to ask Republican senators to give the bill a second chance. Two days later, responding to a request from pivotal GOP senators, he threw his support behind $4.4 billion in immediate funding for "securing our borders and enforcing our laws at the work site." As drafted, the legislation called for the money to become available over a period of several years.

Under a plan that key lawmakers presented to Reid and McConnell, Republicans and Democrats each will have 10-12 opportunities to amend the measure, with the hope that they will then combine to provide the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by die-hard opponents.
We have federal immigration laws that are not being enforced. We have Americans who can't get jobs because illegal workers will take half the pay and no benefits. We have a porous border through which terrorists can easily slip. And we have the Mexican government which refuses to address the social inequities in its country that are the root cause of this problem. Poverty and the hiring in Mexico of South American immigrants are root causes of the immigration wave of desperate people who are easily exploited by human traffickers. The Mexican government has said that it has to hire immigrants from Central and South America to "do the jobs that Mexicans won't do." Sound familiar?

This ludicrous patchwork amnesty bill -- and make no mistake, it is an amnesty bill -- rewards illegal behavior, penalizes immigrants who have followed the rules and contains language that will allow immigration authorities to violate current privacy laws which prevent them from seeing the tax returns of Americans. It's a mess and it is only going to make things worse.

President Bush is dead wrong when he says we must have immigration legislation. We don't need any legislation at all. We need to enforce the laws we have and get tough with Mexico. Our neighbor to the South is actively working to destabilize our economy, because it doesn't want to take care of its own poor people. Increased drug trafficking and violence have also contributed to the problem. The policies of the Mexican government need to be addressed before we even think about drafting new immigration legislation.

A recent Rasmussen poll shows only 20% of Americans think that the bill should be revived in its present form. Not that our president, Ted Kennedy or John McCain cares what we think, of course.

Posted on June 15, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

Bush Opens Borders to Iraqi Refugees

Apparently it wasn't enough to open our southern borders with Mexico, we're now opening our borders to 7,000 more Iraqis who are displaced because of the ill-conceived, poorly-executed Iraq War.
The Bush administration agreed Wednesday to greatly expand the number of Iraqi refugees allowed into the country and to pay more to help Iraq's Arab neighbors cope with the human tide fleeing increasing violence and economic hardship in their country. The decision to allow about 7,000 Iraqis to come to the United States answers mounting political and diplomatic pressure on the administration to do more to remedy the consequences of a war it largely started. Only 202 Iraqis were allowed in last year.

The administration also said it will immediately contribute $18 million for a worldwide resettlement and relief program. The United Nations has asked for $60 million from nations around the world. Although the United Nations estimates that 3.8 million Iraqis have fled their homes since the war began nearly four years ago, the United States has allowed only about 600 to settle in the United States. The U.S. proposal also includes plans to offer special treatment for Iraqis still in their country whose cooperation with the U.S. puts them at risk. Expanding visa programs for those Iraqis would require legislation in Congress, State Department Undersecretary Paula J. Dobriansky said Wednesday.

Some 2 million Iraqis have left their country, and an additional 1.8 million are believed to have relocated inside Iraq. The refugee flow has increased sharply as sectarian violence has increased over the past year. The numbers have overwhelmed the hospitality of Arab neighbors such as Syria and Jordan. The United Nations says most of those who have been uprooted have no desire to come to the United States, and want to return to their homes in Iraq when fighting stops. But allies, U.N. diplomats and lawmakers of both parties have recently told the administration that the small number of Iraqis the U.S. has allowed in looks miserly.

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at a hearing last week that the United States could bring in 7,000 Iraqis this year _ exactly the number announced Wednesday. The move is a step in the right direction, considering the United States is a "chief cause" of the refugee problem, said Carolyn Saour, an Iraqi-American Christian living in Houston. Still, 7,000 "is severely low for the amount of damage that's been done over the years," she said.
This is one excellent reason why we should never have gone into Iraq in the first place: there are going to be millions of displaced refugees and there is going to be nowhere to put them. Saudi Arabia is absolutely terrified of the coming refugee problem, which is why it is building a giant wall along its border with Iraq.

This is just the beginning. The Iraq War is now a civil war, with increasing violence. The neighboring Arab countries are complaining loudly about the influx of refugees which put a terrible economic burden on the host countries. King Abdullah of Jordan already has a big refugee problem on his hands: he has huge camps full of Palestinian refugees. Most of these people just want to go back home, not relocate to a foreign country whose culture and language are absolutely alien to them. Look at England and France: they opened their doors to refugees from oppressive regimes and are now facing a cultural clash and civil unrest like they has never seen before.

But unless the Bush Administration gets its act together and implements the RealPolitik plan proposed by the Iraq Study Group, there isn't going to be a functioning Iraq for these people to return to anytime soon. Taking a few thousand refugees here and there and writing checks to the U.N. is like applying Neosporin to a serious gunshot wound. It's a nice gesture, but it isn't going to stop the patient from dying.

Posted on February 14, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

Senate Votes To Make English The National Language

The U.S. Senate voted today to make English the national language of the United States. But the bill contains softeners so that it does not affect any existing laws which mandate bilingual education.
The measure, approved 63 to 34, directs the government to "preserve and enhance" the role of English, without altering current laws that require some government documents and services be provided in other languages. Opponents, however, said it could negate executive orders, regulations, civil service guidances and other multilingual ordinances not officially sanctioned by acts of Congress.

That vote, considered a defeat for immigration-rights advocates, was followed last night by an important victory: By 58 to 35, the Senate killed an amendment that would have blocked eventual citizenship for future immigrants who arrive under a temporary work permit. Democrats and Republicans agreed that the amendment would have destroyed the fragile, bipartisan coalition backing the Senate bill.

The Senate action came hours after President Bush, who visited the border town of Yuma, Ariz., asked Congress to approve a $1.95 billion budget request to deploy National Guard troops and 1,000 additional enforcement agents to the U.S.-Mexico border. Bush also endorsed for the first time the construction of 370 miles of southern border fences to cut down on illegal immigration.

The English language vote continued the conservative turn that a major overhaul of the nation's immigration laws has taken since the Senate began debate this week. The comprehensive legislation would strengthen border security, allow illegal immigrants who have been in the country five years or more to remain and eventually become citizens, and create a guest-worker program.
Senator Harry Reid called the bill "racist" which is just absurd. Apparently he has failed to read his history books. It is crucial that immigrants become Americans, not stay in little enclaves of people who speak another language and become more and more isolated from the rest of the country. If you talk to any teacher who teaches immigrant students you'll get an earful about how important it is for these children's futures for them to be able to speak English and what a disaster the bilingual teaching programs have been.

To go to college, to land a job interview, to be upwardly-mobile: all these require a command of spoken and written English. Bilingual laws hurt the very people they are supposed to be helping. If the parents don't learn English, the children don't learn English. A proper command of the native language is the requirement for citizenship in most Western countries already. This has nothing to do with race: it has to do with a unified America.

Posted on May 19, 2006
Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



Bush's Immigration Speech: Only Ted Kennedy Is Happy

President Bush's immigration speech last night pleased absolutely no one: except for Ted Kennedy, who gushed on CNN about how much he loves the guest worker program. Too bad that neither his -- nor any other senator's --constituents have the least bit of love for the amnesty program.

The speech was full of the usual platitudes such as:

  • "We are a nation of immigrants" (no we're not, the vast majority of us were born here, our ancestors were legal immigrants, which has absolutely nothing to do with a sovereign country's rights to control its own borders);

  • "We are a nation of laws" (not so you'd notice, corporations are almost never fined for hiring illegal aliens);

  • "Illegal immigrants are good people" (This one is so absurd it's hard to respond to. Some are good people, some are not, as is true for any large group of humans regardless of race, ethnicity or religion. None of which has anything to do with the idea of securing the borders and having a fair, controllable, orderly immigration system.)

  • "Illegal immigrants do the jobs that Americans won't do." (This one is an insult to working class Americans, who will do any job that pays a fair and livable wage. But large corporations want illegal immigrants so they can exploit them, pay slave wages and no benefits, and thereby depress normal wages for American workers. Mexican American labor activist Cesar Chavez was extremely opposed to illegal immigration because he said it depressed wages for legal immigrant workers in the U.S.)
    Other than Ted Kennedy, no one is pleased with the speech -- on the left or the right. And sending 6,000 unarmed National Guard troops to make coffee for the Border Patrol is ineffective at best. It also depletes the states of the manpower they need in a crisis. Here's a better idea: finish hiring the 2,000 Border Patrol agents required by the law passed by Congress and get them to the borders (so far only 210 have been hired by the White House). After the borders are secure, then we can talk about what do to with the 20 million illegal immigrants that are currently living in the U.S.

    Posted on May 16, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

  • The Immigration Issue Moves to the Front Burner

    After James Sensenbrenner got his bill through the House of Representatives, the Latino community (with some "unofficial" help from the Mexican government) organized a series of protests across the nation this past weekend. In Los Angeles, 500,000 protestors hit the streets waving Mexican flags and signs which read "If you think I'm illegal because I'm a Mexican, learn the true history because I'm in my homeland" and "This is stolen land." These people are marching in our country, waving the flag of a foreign government and demanding rights. News flash: rights are for citizens and those who are in the country legally. Woe betide any large group of Americans who tried to pull the same stunt in a foreign country. They'd be arrested and deported on the spot.

    So what are they talking about, anyway? Well, you certainly won't find out by reading The Los Angeles Times, which has now removed the reference to the demonstrators' Mexican flags from its story. What these signs are talking about is "Reconquista" or the Aztlan movement. The theory is this: the Chicanos were here before us, they own Texas, California and most of the Southwest and it's time that they reconquered this land for Mexico. Perhaps the Native Americans might have something to say about this.

    Polls consistently show that Americans do not object to legal immigration, but are extremely concerned about illegal immigration. People who follow the rules and who are willing to integrate into American society are welcome. But to reward those who commit a crime by coming here illegally is repugnant to most Americans. We play by the rules and if you want to be a citizen you have to play by the rules too. Sensenbrenner's proposal was doomed from the beginning because it would send an ER doctor to jail for treating an illegal alien and a priest to jail for feeding an illegal single mother and her child. It's an absurd proposal, and unconstitutional at that. But that doesn't mean that he's wrong about tightening up immigraion laws.

    The borders must be strengthened. And it's time to get tough with Mexico. Mexico actually hands out maps and helpful guides to illegals wanting to cross into the U.S. Instead of cleaning up its own corrupt, bloated government and reforming its policies, it has decided to move its poverty to the U.S. This is unacceptable. It's time for Mexico to pay its workers a living wage: they now only earn $1.87 an hour. Guest worker programs create a permanent underclass of people who then are forced to leave here after 6 years or so. And in the meantime, they have bought homes, gotten married and had children. The children are citizens and now the parents must go back to Mexico. It's unworkable, it's not fair to the immigrants and most of all it's unfair to the Americans living in poverty who would be happy to take those unskilled jobs rather than be unemployed.

    President Bush says that illegal immigrants do the jobs that Americans won't do. That's nonsense. They do the jobs that poorer and more unskilled Americans would be happy to do if only they could get hired.

    Posted on March 27, 2006
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

    The NSA Spying Scandal Deepens

    The New York Timesreports that the NSA Eavesdropping scandal just got bigger: the NSA eavesdropped on phone conversations which took place entirely within the United States, clearly violating the secret program's own rules which required that one person on the phone conversation be outside of the United States. So not only did the program break the law, it broke its own rules for engagement.
    The Bush administration has not released the guidelines that the N.S.A. uses in determining who is suspected of having links to Al Qaeda and may be a target under the program. General Hayden said the determination was made by operational people at the agency and "must be signed off by a shift supervisor," with the process closely scrutinized by officials at the agency, the Justice Department and elsewhere.

    But questions about the legal and operational oversight of the program last year prompted the administration to suspend aspects of it temporarily and put in place tighter restrictions on the procedures used to focus on suspects, said people with knowledge of the program. The judge who oversees the secret court that authorizes intelligence warrants - and which has been largely bypassed by the program - also raised concerns about aspects of the program.
    In a related story, the ACLU has filed Freedom of Information Act requests after learning that the FBI has been spying on groups such as PETA (animal rights activists), Greenpeace and peace movements.
    To expose FBI monitoring of political and religious groups in the United States, the ACLU filed FOIAs in 20 states on behalf of over 150 organizations and individuals. Today the ACLU made public the latest documents obtained in the project which confirm that the FBI is using counterterrorism resources to monitor and infiltrate advocacy groups including PETA, Greenpeace, the American Arab Anti Defamation Committee the ACLU itself. www­.aclu.org/safefree/spying/23124prs20051220.html
    Shouldn't the NSA, the CIA and the FBI be tracking Osama bin Laden and his henchmen? Or trying to make our borders more secure, as John Kerry kept saying during the last election? Apparently, they're more worried about PETA's campaign to keep Jennifer Lopez from using fur in her new fashion collection than protecting us from terrorists sneaking in across the porous Texas-Mexico border.

    Posted on December 20, 2005
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



    Political Roundup 8-7-05

  • Blogger and journalist Steven Vincent has been murdered in Iraq following a New York Times article where Vincent explained how Islamic religious extremist were taking control of Basra and running the police force.

  • Construction of a reinforced concerted barrier will begin soon in Arizona. The AP reports that the barrier will "eventually cover 123 miles from San Luis to Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument south of Ajo."

  • U.S. Senator Joe Biden, who intends to run for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, has cut a deal with Random House to publish his memoir.

  • Katherine Harris says newspapers doctored photographs and colorized her make-up to make it appear worse than it actually was:
    On Monday, on a conservative radio talk show, Harris, now a congresswoman from Longboat Key running for the U.S. Senate, hit back, blaming newspapers for the criticism and charging that some - without saying which - altered her photographs.

    "I'm actually very sensitive about those things, and it's personally painful," Harris said when host Sean Hannity asked about her image problems from 2000.

    "But they're outrageously false, No. 1, and No. 2, you know, whenever they made fun of my makeup, it was because the newspapers colorized my photograph," Harris said.

    She didn't explain what she meant by "colorized."
  • Colin Powell the venture capitalist. Powell, the former Secretary of States has taken a job with Kleiner Perkins.

  • Ambassador Joseph Wilson told the Brad Blog that President Bush should fire Karl Rove.

  • Respected journalist Helen Thomas threatens to off herself if Cheney runs for President in 2008.
    "The day Dick Cheney is going to run for president, I'll kill myself," she told The Hill newspaper. "All we need is one more liar."
  • Here is a look at how Beijing censors the blogosphere. Even Microsoft cooperates and allows words like "democracy" to be censored by the Chinese government.

  • TPMCafe.com has a post by a former classmate of Valerie Plame.

  • Reuters reports that the Pentagon has requested that the recruitment age be raised from 35 to 42.

  • Telemarketers are trying to poke holes in the Do Not Call list by getting the FCC to change some state laws.

  • Juan Cole follows the origins of Al Qaeda from the half billion dollar annual budget of support for the radical Muslim Mujahidin in Afghanistan under President Ronald Reagan to today's War on Terror.

  • The L.A. Times reports on President Bush's obsession with exercise.

  • GamersGame.com reports that Congress has called for a federal investigation into game developer Rockstar after explicit sex acts were found inside their Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas game.
    U.S. House of Representatives has voted 355 to 21 to pass House Resolution 376 which calls for a federal inquiry to determine if Rockstar intentionally deceived the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) to avoid an Adults-Only rating. The bill was introduced by Congressman Fred Upton (R - MI).
    US Senator Hillary Clinton was also outspoken in calling for an investigation of Rockstar.

    Posted on August 7, 2005
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

  • Bush Shocked at White House Passport Plans

    Apparently, someone forgot to tell President Bush about the new regulations which will require Americans to have a passport to re-enter the United States from Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean. The new regulations are supposed to take effect by 2008. But since only 20% of Americans have passports and so many people go back and forth across the Texas-Mexico, California-Mexico and the U.S-Canada borders every day, the new regs are going to be a real pain in the neck for many businesses and tourists. At a press conference Thursday, President Bush expressed surprise about the new regs, which is in itself surprising because the White House had signed off on the change.
    "When I first read that in the newspaper about the need to have passports, particularly the day crossings that take place, about a million for instance in the state of Texas, I said, 'What's going on here?'" Bush said when asked about the new rules at an American Society of Newspaper Editors convention. "I thought there was a better way to expedite the legal flow of traffic and people."

    The president said he has instructed Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and officials from the Department of Homeland Security to see if there is enough flexibility in the new policy to accommodate regular travelers, including truckers and tourists. Bush said one option might be electronic fingerprint imaging, "to serve as a so-called passport for daily traffic."

    A senior U.S. government official involved in the policy change said Homeland Security and State Department officials had vetted the change exhaustively with the White House before announcing it. The officials said they always anticipated some changes would be needed.
    So, will you need a passport to go to Tijuana from San Diego? Or to come back to Seattle by ferry from Vancouver Island? Beats me. But you might want to get that passport up to date, just in case.

    Posted on April 15, 2005
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati

    The Minutemen Ride Again

    The Associated Press shares the exciting news that the Minutemen are riding again. What's that, you ask? Should I grab my trusty musket, join the Massachusetts Colony Militia and prepare to defend our beloved home against the British? Ummm, no. Not exactly. The embattled Arizonians who have the misfortune to live near the Mexico border are sick and tired of illegal aliens crossing their lands and the federal government doing nothing about it. The property damage and violence is no joke and the citizens have had enough. So has the Border Patrol, by the way. But every time they complain to Washington, their budget gets cut even further. This is what happens when our own government refuses to police its own borders. So the 500 citizen Minutemen are going to patrol the border, looking for illegals then reporting them to the authorities. They will never exceed their authority, challenge suspected illegals directly or engage in violent acts just because many of them carry weapons. Trained? No, they're not trained. But I'm sure it will be fine. Really.

    Posted on February 21, 2005
    Permalink | Digg this | Blogs linking to this post: Google | Technorati



    Our Blogs

    Bloggers Blog
    Book Blog
    Crafters Craft
    Drivers Drive
    Fantasy SF Blog
    Gamers Game
    Health News Blog
    HowToWeb.com
    The IWJ Blog
    Lovers Love
    Media Cynic
    Petosphere
    Pleasant Morning Buzz
    Science News Blog
    Shopping Blog
    Singers Sing
    Surfers Surf
    Traders Trade
    Video Nacho
    Watchers Watch
    Workers Work
    The Write News
    Writer's Blog


    Text Ads




    www.mediacynic.com
    Copyright © 2003-2007 by Writers Write, Inc. All Rights Reserved.