|
April, 2005 Archives
Bush's New Twist on Social Security: Cut Benefits for the Middle Class
Well, that was a bit of an eye-opener. Last night, President Bush announced the fuzzy outlines of his plans to revamp social security. He doesn't have all the kinks worked out yet, but here are the linchpins of the plan: 1) tie benefits to prices (that is, inflation), not wages, which would produce a hefty cut in guaranteed benefits over time, 2) reduce benefits for the middle class and so-called wealthy Americans "to help the poor", and --you guessed it-- 3)private savings accounts coupled with yet more reductions in guaranteed benefits. It's certainly a novel approach. Cut benefits for the middle class; you know, the majority of Americans, those people who actually vote in elections. As Frank Newport of Gallup said, the more Bush talks about social security the more his poll numbers drop. But those in the echo chamber don't seem to hear what Americans are saying.
Posted on April 29, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Eliot Spitzer Goes After Spyware
Wired reports on New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's new war on spyware. Spitzer, who is attempting to follow in the footsteps of Rudi Guiliani and a higher national profile, filed a civil suit against Intermix Medica of Los Angeles. Intermix is being sued over their installation of unwanted spyware and adware on unwary computer users.
Spitzer said the suit filed in New York City against Intermix Media of Los Angeles combats the redirecting of home computer users to unwanted websites and its own website that includes ads, the adding of unnecessary toolbar items and the delivery of unwanted ads that pop up on computer screens. After a six-month investigation, Spitzer concluded the company installed a wide range of advertising software on countless personal computers nationwide.
"Spyware and adware are more than an annoyance," Spitzer said. "These fraudulent programs foul machines, undermine productivity and in many cases frustrate consumers' efforts to remove them from their computers. These issues can serve to be a hindrance to the growth of e-commerce."
Spitzer's civil suit accuses Intermix of violating state General Business Law provisions against false advertising and deceptive business practices. He also accuses them of trespass under New York common law.
The company is accused of download ads and software that directs ads to a computer based on the user's activities. Spitzer's investigators said the downloads then attach to computers, often slowing their operation and crashing the computers as well as interfering with use of the computer through pop-up ads. Often the downloads were made without notice when a user visited a website, played a game or accepted a screen saver. Sometimes the user was asked permission through an often vague reference in a lengthy licensing agreement which could be misleading or inaccurate, investigators said.
This is only the beginning, says Spitzer. He believes that spyware, adware and identity theft are eroding consumer confidence and slowing the growth of e-commerce. And I couldn't agree more. More power to him.
Posted on April 28, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
A (Cuban) Cigar For Tom DeLay
Time magazine shares an interesting tidbit about our our embattled House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay. When he's not railing against Cuba, Fidel Castro, and the laws of Florida concerning feeding tubes, he's firing up a big fat Cuban stogie.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. And sometimes, according to House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, a cigar is an economic prop to a brutal totalitarian regime. Arguing against loosening sanctions against Cuba last year, DeLay warned that Fidel Castro "will take the money. Every dime that finds its way into Cuba first finds its way into Fidel Castro's blood-thirsty hands.... American consumers will get their fine cigars and their cheap sugar, but at the cost of our national honor."
DeLay has long been one of Congress' most vocal critics of what he calls Castro's "thugocracy," which is why some sharp-eyed Time readers were surprised last week to see a photo of the Majority Leader smoking one of Cuba's best?a Hoyo de Monterrey double corona, which generally costs about $25 when purchased overseas and is not available in this country. The cigar's label clearly states that it was made in "Habana." The photo was taken in Jerusalem on July 28, 2003, during a meeting between DeLay and the Republican Jewish Coalition at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.
What's that you say? Cuban cigars are illegal here in the U.S., and now it's even illegal for an American to smoke a Cuban cigar while abroad? Well, you sniveling freedom-hater, I'll have you know that Mr. DeLay was smoking that Cuban cigar in Israel in 2003, and it wasn't until September, 2004 that the regs were introduced banning Americans from doing anything naughty while they are abroad. Ok, perhaps some might see it as hypocritical to smoke an aromatic Cuban cigar while proclaiming that anyone who does so is "destroying our national honor." But at least he was smoking the cigar. It could have been worse.
Posted on April 28, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Putin Complicates Middle East Politics
Not about to be outdone by Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, Russian President Vladimir Putin headed off to the Middle East this week. After chatting with Hosni Mubarak in Egypt yesterday, Putin landed in Israel for a round of talks with Israeli leaders about selling Russian missiles to Syria. But the most important reason for Putin to travel to the area is to upstage the U.S. in the stalled Mideast peace process. In Cairo, Putin called for a Middle East peace conference to be held in Moscow. He talked about how all the countries involved in the process should be at the conference. Although Russia is technically a sponsor of the "Road Map to Peace" it really hasn't done much; this is America's ballgame and everyone knows it. Or it used to be. Officially, Israel supports a conference. But private statements from Israeli government officials to the press indicate irritation with the Russians' attempt to horn in on the process. The Palestinians embrace the idea of an international conference and want to know why they have to wait until the fall to do it. The White House hasn't commented yet. Putin going to the Middle East is unusual, to say the least.
Putin's stop in Cairo was the first state visit to Egypt by a Russian or Soviet leader since Nikita Khrushchev came in 1964 to inaugurate construction of the Aswan High Dam, which the Soviet Union helped finance.
Egypt's close ties with Moscow began waning after Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser died in 1970. Nasser's successor, Anwar Sadat, set the regional powerhouse on a pro-American track that accelerated under Mubarak.
Putin's trip to Israel is the first by a Kremlin leader to the Jewish state and is part of his effort to burnish an image as a world leader amid accusations of backsliding on democracy at home.
It comes as increasingly close ties between the two countries are threatened by Russia's determination to push ahead with a missile sale to Syria that Israel considers threatening. Other potential sore points are Moscow's nuclear aid to Iran, signs of rising anti-Semitism in Russia and the Kremlin's push to extradite several former Russian billionaires who have taken residence in Israel.
Can President Putin make his mark in the Mideast? He appears to want to be known as a peacemaker. Which would certainly be a first for him. I still think this is all about putting us in our place over Iraq and our grumping to Putin about his helping Iran make nuclear power plants (and God knows what else.) My guess is that our State Department is now debating how to counter Putin's moves without being openly antagonistic.
Posted on April 27, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bush's Poll Numbers Tumble
Editor and Publisher reports on the latest Gallup poll, and it's not good news for the White House. 50% if all Americans now belive that the Bush administration deliberately misled the country about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
"This is the highest percentage that Gallup has found on this measure since the question was first asked in late May 2003," the pollsters observed. "At that time, 31% said the administration deliberately misled Americans. This sentiment has gradually increased over time, to 39% in July 2003, 43% in January/February 2004, and 47% in October 2004."
Also, according to the latest poll, more than half of Americans, 54%, disapprove of the way President Bush is handling the situation in Iraq, while 43% approve. In early February, Americans were more evenly divided on the way Bush was handling the situation in Iraq, with 50% approving and 48% disapproving. Last week Gallup reported that 53% now believe that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was "not worth it."
The Gallup poll, coupled with the pathetic state of the War on
Terror is not good news for a president who said that he'd better get his favorite legislation pushed through early in 2005 or he'd be "quacking like a duck" before the first year of his second term ended.
Posted on April 26, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Condi Tells Iraqis to Get Their Act Together
Frustrated with the minimal results from their hands-off approach to forming an Iraqi government, Condeleeza Rice and Dick Cheney have started working the phones, telling Iraqi leaders to hurry up and form a new government. The New York Times reports:
Worried about a political deadlock in Iraq and a spike in mayhem from an emboldened insurgency, the Bush administration has pressed Iraqi leaders in recent days to end their stalemate over forming a new government, with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Vice President Dick Cheney personally exhorting top Kurdish and Shiite politicians to come together.
The White House pressure, reported by Iraqi officials in Baghdad and an American official in Washington on Sunday, was a change in the administration's hands-off approach to Iraqi politics. The change was disclosed as insurgents unleashed a devastating technique, with twin double bombings at a police academy in Tikrit and an ice cream parlor in a Shiite neighborhood of Baghdad that killed 21 and wounded scores more.
Ms. Rice on Friday telephoned Iraq's new president, Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, to urge him to complete the government "as soon as they could" and "to get a status of where things were," a senior State Department official in Washington said Sunday. The official stressed that Ms. Rice did not tell Mr. Talabani how to form a government, just that the process needed to be concluded.
The Shiites don't seem to be taking the prodding very well. They surprised everyone by announcing that our guy Dr. Allawi will now have no part in the new government at all. And the Shiites are also saying that they will be much more strict with Sharia law than those slackers in Iran. Great. Just great.
Posted on April 25, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Colin Powell's Revenge
Colin Powell may be out of the State Department, but it appears that he's still in the game. The former Secretary of State has been working behind the scenes to kill the nomination of John Bolton as Ambassador to the U.N.
Mr. Powell has not spoken publicly about the Bolton nomination. But his associates said he had told two Republican senators, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, that he had been troubled by the way Mr. Bolton had treated an intelligence analyst and others at the State Department who had disagreed with him.
Mr. Chafee and Mr. Hagel, both members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, have expressed concern about Mr. Bolton's temperament, credibility and treatment of intelligence analysts. The senators' concerns, with those of Senator George V. Voinovich, the Ohio Republican, were among the factors that led the committee to postpone a vote on Mr. Bolton's nomination until next month.
Accounts were conflicting as to whether Mr. Powell or the senators had initiated the phone calls. A spokeswoman for Mr. Powell said he had only returned calls from others, but one person familiar with one conversation said it had been Mr. Powell who had reached out to Mr. Hagel.
Meanwhile, President Bush has ignored advice to drop Bolton like a hot potato and nominate someone more suited to the post. In fact, he is pushing harder than ever for the nomination. Moderate Republicans respect and like Colin Powell. If the Bolton nomination goes up in flames, it will be the first visible power move from Secretary Powell. And defeating Bolton would be sweet revenge for Powell, who was reportedly hurt when he wasn't asked to stay on as secretary of state for Bush's second term.
Posted on April 22, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Condi Meets the Russians
According to Fox News, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin was pretty tense. When a high-level meeting between governments has not gone especially well, the participants sometimes speak afterward of their "frank exchange of views."
Such was apparently the case on Wednesday in Moscow, where Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
But on issue after issue -- the pace of Russia's democratization, restrictions on foreign oil investors and the security of Russian nuclear materials -- the secretary spoke only of differences aired, not of tangible progress made.
At one point, her host, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, responded sarcastically to Rice's exhortations.
"I would say, like the U.S. is interested in a strong and a democratic Russia that could play its active role internationally, we are also interested that the U.S. should be a strong and democratic partner and country playing an active role internationally," said Lavrov.
Our Secretary of State apparently took Mr. Putin to task for 1) making it difficult or impossible for U.S. oil firms to bid on jobs in Russia 2) Putin's crackdown on the independent media and 3) Russia's slowdown on the joint American-Russian dismantling of Soviet-area nuclear sites. Apparently, Putin wants us to clean up all the hazardous material (and I hear there's quite a bit of it) and indemnify Russia if there's some kind of horrible industrial accident during the clean-up operations.
Did you notice that the minute she was sworn in as secretary of state she immediately took off for the far side of the planet? I mean, they hardly let Colin Powell out of Washington, and now Condi is already on track to be the most-traveled Secretary of State in American history. Maybe she's just trying to get away from the Bolton confirmation hearings. And who could blame her for that?
Posted on April 21, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bolton Vote Delayed
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to postpone until next month the vote on John Bolton's bid to become Ambassador to the U.N. Senator Lugar, the chairman of the panel caved in after a suprise defection by Republican George V. Voinovich of Ohio. Realizing that if he took a vote on Tuesday, Bolton was dead in the water, Lugar postponed the vote to give the White House more time to twist Voinovich's arm. The testimony was pretty damning: Bolton was accused of witholding information from Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice, of harassing and abusing his employees and of mishandling intelligence. But the most bizarre behavior reported was from Bolton's time in the private sector.
Sen. Biden of Delaware, the senior Democrat on the committee, read from a letter [Melody Townsel, a former contract worker for the United States Agency for International Development] had sent the committee, although he did not name her.
Ms. Townsel, whose allegations had begun to emerge in the news media , has said that for two weeks in 1994, when Mr. Bolton was working as a private lawyer for a subcontractor that clashed with her employer, he harassed her in a Moscow hotel, falsely claiming that she had misused funds and could face jail.
"'Mr. Bolton,'" Mr. Biden read from the letter, "proceeded to chase me through the halls of a Russian hotel, throwing things at me, shoving threatening letters under my door, and genuinely behaving like a madman. I eventually retreated to my hotel room and stayed there. Mr Bolton then routinely visited me to pound on the door and shout threats.'"
Senator Harry Reid, the Democratic leader, said today that Mr. Bolton's alleged comments to Ms. Townsel about possibly facing jail were "absolute lies."
After hearing about the crazed, more youthful, Bolton barrelling down the halls of a Russian hotel screaming and threatening Ms. Townsel, Senator Voinovich had had enough, explaining his change of heart by saying, "My conscience got me. I wanted more information about this individual, and I didn't feel comfortable voting for him." Scott McClellan has threatened to quickly be in touch with the Senator to "put his concerns to rest."
So if Kofi Annan does something that Ambassador Bolton doesn't like, will he chase Mr. Annan down the halls of the United Nations screaming obscenities in a sort of "Fear Factor at the U.N."? And will it be televised?
Posted on April 20, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bad News For the Depressed and Anxious
Those who tend to depression will be pushed closer to the edge of despair when they read about yet another study that warns if you're not happy, you're probably going to get heart disease and die. But that's not all. Apparently, those prone to depression and anxiety are 40% more likely to get dementia. Oh, and don't bother taking quitting smoking, staying out of the sun, jogging or trying to eat right to improve your health; it's all pointless anyway says Gina Kolata in a particularly absurd article for the New York Times. I've got a better idea. How about we get Gina some anti-depressants and a subscription to all the top medical journals. She might just find life worth living.
Posted on April 19, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
The Secretive World of John Bolton
The interesting tidbits continue to emerge about Ambassador to the United Nations nominee John Bolton. The Washington Post details Mr. Bolton's efforts to hide information from Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and it's not pretty. John R. Bolton -- who is seeking confirmation as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations -- often blocked then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and, on one occasion, his successor, Condoleezza Rice, from receiving information vital to U.S. strategies on Iran, according to current and former officials who have worked with Bolton.
In some cases, career officials found back channels to Powell or his deputy, Richard L. Armitage, who encouraged assistant secretaries to bring information directly to him. In other cases, the information was delayed for weeks or simply did not get through. The officials, who would discuss the incidents only on the condition of anonymity because some continue to deal with Bolton on other issues, cited a dozen examples of memos or information that Bolton refused to forward during his four years as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security.
Bolton's time at the State Department under Rice has been brief. But authoritative officials said Bolton let her go on her first European trip without knowing about the growing opposition there to Bolton's campaign to oust the head of the U.N. nuclear agency. "She went off without knowing the details of what everybody else was saying about how they were not going to join the campaign," according to a senior official. Bolton has been trying to replace Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, who is perceived by some within the Bush administration as too soft on Iran.
Naughty, naughty John Bolton; it's no wonder that Condi has instructed her staff to freeze Bolton out of all discussions about Iran.
Posted on April 18, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Iraqi Hostage Puzzle
USA Today describes reports that a large number of Shiite Muslims have been taken hostage by Sunni insurgents.
Iraq's interim government said Sunday that it had dispatched several battalions of security forces to a small village in central Iraq in response to reports of Sunni Muslims capturing and holding large numbers of Shiite hostages.
Jouwad al-Maliky, a member of the National Assembly's Shiite majority, claimed about 200 people were being held in the village of Madain. He gave no further details about the incident.
But then it gets weirder.
But an Interior Ministry spokesman, Sabah Khadim, said no hostages or militants were found after security forces surrounded the village. Security forces will continue to search the area, he said. Khadim said early reports of the hostage-taking, which emerged Thursday, were unsubstantiated and being exploited by politicians.
So what's going on? Is half a town being held hostage or is it just an "unsubstantiated" rumor? And is this Sabah Kahdim guy by chance related to the former Iraqi Information Minister? Maybe if CNN, Fox and the networks would spend more time on international news and less on the Michael Jackson case, we'd know.
Posted on April 17, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
President Bush Has Slime-Mold Beetle Named After Him
In an exciting development, President Bush has had a slime-mold beetle named after him. The beetle's scientific name is now Agathidium bushi. Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney have slime-mold beetles named after them too. Rumsfeld's beetle is the Agathidium rumsfeldi and Cheney's is the Agathidium cheneyi. The two entomologists who named the beetles said the names were an honor and that it "didn't have anything to do with physical features." One of the entomologists said he admired all three men for "having the courage of their convictions" and standing up for freedom and democracy.
Other beetles were named after the scientists' wives, Star Wars ?ber-villain Darth Vader and the Greek words for "ugly" and "having prominent teeth." (BBC via Science News Blog.)
Posted on April 16, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
The Wall Street Journal Takes Aim at DeLay
The Wall Street Journal fired off another volley at embattled House Majority Leader Tom Delay Friday. After previously taking him to task for the large salaries he pays family members out of campaign fund, the Journal now takes aim at what is by far more serious ethics charges: the lavish trips taken by the DeLay family paid for by various corporations and shadowy Russian businessmen.
As winter storms battered the country this January, Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas and his wife, Christine, flew to Hawaii. They stayed at the Big Island's Hapuna Beach Prince Hotel with views of what Cond? Nast Traveler calls America's No. 1 beach. Mr. DeLay also played on an Arnold Palmer-designed golf course that climbs from the shoreline to a 700-foot-high bluff overlooking the ocean.
The DeLays' five-day trip cost $10,000, according to congressional travel records, but they didn't pay for it. Instead, the tab was picked up by corporations and trade organizations that represent U.S. airports and airlines. The Republican leader's sole obligation was to participate in a panel discussion on the first morning of the annual aviation conference of the American Association of Airport Executives. More than 40 lawmakers and staffers from both parties also attended the conference.
The article goes on to describe many such trips paid for by corporations who lobby for legislative favors, as well as many other trips for government staffers that are paid for by taxpayers.
So long as the family members are performing legitimate services for a member of Congress, it's legal. Many members of Congress hire family members to work on their campaigns, which is fair. What is more bothersome is the growing influence of lobbyists and other shadowy groups on Congress.
So, how much fun did Tom DeLay have on his all-expenses paid vacation to Hawaii? Well, to begin with, his flight was delayed by one day due to severe weather. When he finally stepped off the plane at Kona International Airport (no doubt expecting a Hawaiian beauty to lovingly hang a lei around his youthful, plastic surgery-enhanced neck), he got more bad news. In a cruel twist of fate, he was informed that his luggage had been lost.
Posted on April 16, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
The Sartorial Sneers of John Bolton
Robin Givhan of The Washington Post lights into John Bolton for his sartorial slovenliness at his congressional confirmation hearings to become our new ambassador to the United Nations. John Bolton, President Bush's nominee for ambassador to the United Nations, desperately needs a haircut. It does not have to be a $600 Sally Hershberger cut. Bolton simply needs the basics. Tidy the curling, unruly locks at the nape of his neck, tame the volume at the crown, reel in the wings flapping above his ears, and broker a compromise between his sand-colored mop and his snow-colored mustache.
He needs to do this, not because he should be minding the recommendations of men's fashion magazines or grooming experts but because when he settled in before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this week to answer questions about his record, his philosophy and his intentions at the U.N., he looked as though he did not even have enough respect for the proceedings to bother combing his hair -- or, for that matter, straightening his tie, or wearing a shirt that did not put his neck in a chokehold. Bolton was one wrinkled suit away from being an insolent mess.
Bolton sat across from his questioners with a thick, dull slab of hair positioned diagonally across his forehead. It is tempting to say that he has a sloppy schoolboy's haircut, but that would malign studious young men and suggest that they are dismissive of propriety and the importance of making a good public impression. Looking back to Bolton's school days at Yale, one notices that he was better groomed in his younger years. In his 1970 class book photo, Bolton essentially has the same haircut, but his locks are not drooping over his forehead as if he'd stepped from the shower and shaken his hair dry in the manner of an Afghan hound. His tie also appears to be straight. Thirty-five years ago, his shirt fit. (Perhaps it is the same shirt?)
So, if how you dress for your confirmation hearings indicates your respect (or lack thereof) for your questioners, what does this tell us about other nominees? Condi dressed up for her hearings and actually made a point of smiling while the committee members lobbed rhetorical grenades at her. Alberto Gonzales has his hair cut properly, as I recall, and had a suit that was pressed and cleaned. And while we're on this subject, I seem to recall a Supreme Court nominee named Robert Bork who had a wild and woolly little beard, and generally looked like a disheveled mess at his hearings. And we all know what happened to him.
Posted on April 15, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bush Shocked at White House Passport Plans
Apparently, someone forgot to tell President Bush about the new regulations which will require Americans to have a passport to re-enter the United States from Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean. The new regulations are supposed to take effect by 2008. But since only 20% of Americans have passports and so many people go back and forth across the Texas-Mexico, California-Mexico and the U.S-Canada borders every day, the new regs are going to be a real pain in the neck for many businesses and tourists. At a press conference Thursday, President Bush expressed surprise about the new regs, which is in itself surprising because the White House had signed off on the change.
"When I first read that in the newspaper about the need to have passports, particularly the day crossings that take place, about a million for instance in the state of Texas, I said, 'What's going on here?'" Bush said when asked about the new rules at an American Society of Newspaper Editors convention. "I thought there was a better way to expedite the legal flow of traffic and people."
The president said he has instructed Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and officials from the Department of Homeland Security to see if there is enough flexibility in the new policy to accommodate regular travelers, including truckers and tourists. Bush said one option might be electronic fingerprint imaging, "to serve as a so-called passport for daily traffic."
A senior U.S. government official involved in the policy change said Homeland Security and State Department officials had vetted the change exhaustively with the White House before announcing it. The officials said they always anticipated some changes would be needed.
So, will you need a passport to go to Tijuana from San Diego? Or to come back to Seattle by ferry from Vancouver Island? Beats me. But you might want to get that passport up to date, just in case.
Posted on April 15, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Frist About to Go Nuclear: In More Ways Than One
According to The Washington Post, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is ready to go nuclear: in more ways than one. If he's not careful, he's going to drop an atom bomb on his political career.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is all but certain to press for a rule change that would ban filibusters of judicial nominations in the next few weeks, despite misgivings by some of his fellow Republicans and a possible Democratic backlash that could paralyze the chamber, close associates said yesterday.
The strategy carries significant risks for the Tennessee Republican, who is weighing a 2008 presidential bid. It could embroil the Senate in a bitter stalemate that would complicate passage of President Bush's agenda and raise questions about Frist's leadership capabilities. Should he fail to make the move or to get the necessary votes, however, Frist risks the ire of key conservative groups that will play big roles in the 2008 GOP primaries.
Clearly, Frist has his eye on those 2008 presidential primaries and is terrified of incurring the wrath of the religious right. Otherwise, why in the world would he be participating in this so-called "Justice Sunday". What is Justice Sunday, you ask? Why it's an upcoming telecast by "prominent Christian conservatives" which will portray
Democrats as being "against people of faith" because they have blocked 10 of President Bush's judicial nominees from coming to a floor vote (they allowed 229 to go through).
Fliers for the telecast, organized by the Family Research Council and scheduled to originate at a Kentucky megachurch the evening of April 24, call the day "Justice Sunday" and depict a young man holding a Bible in one hand and a gavel in the other. The flier does not name participants, but under the heading "the filibuster against people of faith," it reads: "The filibuster was once abused to protect racial bias, and it is now being used against people of faith."
Former Republican Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole and Democratic Former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell both oppose ending the filibuster and have warned that such a move could come back to hurt Republicans in the future. After all, things change and when Republicans are in the minority they may need that filibuster rule one day.
Senator Frist tries to portray himself as a voice of reason. But appearing on this telecast could alienate libertarian and fiscal conservative Republicans, many of whom are moderate on social issues and are mighty uncomfortable with Frist's questionable conduct during the Schiavo debacle. So, what will happen during this telecast anyway? Will Frist witness to the congregation that he's had a vision that the next president will have an M.D.? Will he speak in tongues? Will there be snakes? Please, let there be snakes.
Posted on April 14, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bush, Sharon and the Pecan-Smoked Beef Tenderloin
So, we all know that Ariel Sharon finally scored an invite to President Bush's ranch in Crawford Texas. And they talked about the Road Map to Peace, the Israeli settlements, Iran's building nukes, yada yada yada. But what did President Bush's chef serve for the one hour lunch? After all, there are only so many ways you can bake a beef tenderloin. And we all know that our president likes beef and lots of it (despite Bill Clinton's comments that they now serve turkey burgers aboard Airforce One.) Scott McClellan shares the lunch details with reporters:
And if you want the menu -- here, I'll just give you the menu for the lunch. They had Arugula and Blood Orange Salad, Pecan-Smoked Beef Tenderloin -- which was very good -- Grilled Asparagus and Roasted Seasonal Vegetables, some Homemade Peach Sorbet, and then topped it off with some Brownies.
Aha! Pecan-smoked tenderloin. Pecan-encrusted Tenderloin, Filet of Beef Tenderloin with Asparagus (the second Inaugural Dinner), Barbequed Tenderloin, Baked tenderloin, Beef Wellington, Mesquite-smoked Peppered Beef Tenderloin (that was for President Putin's visit): if it can be done to a beef tenderloin, the presidential chef has done it with style. It certainly shows that President Bush is not in the least concerned about those Canadian cattle infected with mad cow disease. You remember the Canadian beef ban of three years ago? Well, it got partially lifted by Bush as of March 7th, but an activist judge put a stop to the imports at the request of the ranching group R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America on the grounds that consumers would be endangered. The trial is on July 27th. Who doesn't love a good beef tenderloin? But I think I'll have a turkey burger tonight.
Posted on April 13, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Workers Feeling the Squeeze
The Los Angeles Times leads today with a pithy little piece about how American workers are increasingly unable to afford the rising costs of gas, rent and food because of the stagnation of wages.
This is the first time that salaries have increased more slowly than prices since the 1990-91 recession. Though salary growth has been relatively sluggish since the 2001 downturn, inflation also had stayed relatively subdued until last year, when the consumer price index rose 2.7%. But wages rose only 2.5%.
The effective 0.2-percentage-point erosion in workers' living standards occurred while the economy expanded at a healthy 4%, better than the 3% historical average.
Meanwhile, corporate profits hit record highs as companies got more productivity out of workers while keeping pay increases down....
But higher wages could hurt the economy by stoking inflation further. Employers might pass the costs on to consumers in higher prices, and that in turn might prompt the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates more aggressively, possibly slowing the recovery or even triggering a recession.
The official unemployment rate of 5.2% is not bad, although it fails to count the large number of underemployed and those that have dropped out of the job market entirely. And employers are screaming about how much it costs to hire new people. So what's the real problem here? You guessed it: the out of control healthcare costs.
With benefits factored in, workers' total compensation did outpace inflation in 2004, even if they didn't see it in their paychecks. But employers also are requiring workers to pay a greater share of their premiums.
"Healthcare has eroded the wage base," said Janemarie Mulvey, chief economist with the Employment Policy Foundation, a business-funded think tank in Washington.
Of course, some common sense ways to get healthcare costs under control, such as allowing the government to negotiate prices for Medicare prescription drugs, are unavailable because the drug company lobby made sure that a prohibition against the government negotiating drug prices was written into the new Medicare law. And rising drug prices are going to continue fueling the healthcare costs.
As for private employers, they will simply shift more of the cost of health insurance to their employees -- or stop offering coverage at all. Meanwhile, look for gas prices to continue to rise at the pump. None of this bodes well for the American middle class.
Posted on April 12, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Cardinal Bernard Law Celebrates Mass
What a slap in the face to Boston Catholics: Cardinal Bernard Law celebrated Mass in mourning for Pope John Paul II in St. Peter's Basilica today, in spite of protests from victims' rights groups. You remember Cardinal Law? He's the guy that moved known pedophile priests from parish to parish, instead of turning them into the police. Many Catholics in Boston called for his resignation, but the Vatican called him to Rome and gave him the job of being archpriest at the Basilica of St. Mary Major in Rome, one of the four basilicas which report directly to the Vatican. Some punishment.
Posted on April 11, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Women Hold Their Own in Combat
Knight-Ridder has an interesting story about military women who are increasingly being involved in firefights in Iraq. Army Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester bolted from her Humvee, took cover behind a berm along the road and began firing at the swarm of insurgents ambushing a U.S. military convoy south of Baghdad.
"Bullets were flying everywhere," said Hester, 23, of Bowling Green. "I could hear them pinging off the truck in back of me. I could hear them hitting the ground next to me. It was pretty crazy."
For almost a half-hour, Hester and nine other Kentucky National Guard soldiers, including another woman, Spec. Ashley Pullen, fought off 40 to 50 attackers armed with assault rifles, machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades. When the shooting ended, 26 insurgents lay dead and seven were wounded.
With the insurgency growing, American women are increasingly under fire in Iraq--and appear to be performing just as well as the men do. Why, we haven't had even one report of a woman wringing her hands and crying about a ruined manicure when she should be shooting at crazed insurgents. What a surprise.
Posted on April 8, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Senator Mel Martinez Fesses Up Over Infamous Schiavo Talking Points Memo
The gig is up for Senator Mel Martinez (R-Florida); he finally admitted that it was his office that drafted the now infamous memo saying how great the Schiavo case could be for Republicans politically. The hot potato memo has been denounced by every single Senator, as they all tried to edge away from the cliff of negative public opinion over Congress' meddling in the Schiavo case. According to Raw Story, Martinez's aide drafted the memo which he had in a coat pocket. Then, a Three Stooges Moment occurred:
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, asked for information on the bill a Martinez authored in regards to the Schiavo case, Martinez said, and Martinez "pulled a one-page document from his coat pocket and handed to Harkin," according to AP.
"Unbeknownst to me," Martinez revealed, "I had given him a copy of the now infamous memo."
Oops.
Posted on April 7, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Bloomberg Blasts DeLay
When Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal both take shots at Tom DeLay, that's when you know he's got big trouble that no amount of whining about the liberal media is going to make go away. Bloomberg reports:
One of the surest paths to riches in Washington is to have these five words on a resume: "Office of Representative Tom DeLay."
Eleven lobbyists who once worked for the Texas Republican and House majority leader helped bring in at least $45 million in fees for their firms in the past two years. By comparison, former aides of House Speaker Dennis Hastert lobbying during that period helped bring in about $2.1 million.
Bloomberg takes readers and leads them by the hand as to DeLay's receipt of lobbying largesse.
Hirschmann [DeLay's chief of staff until 2002] lobbied Congress to add a prescription-drug benefit to Medicare that would prevent the government from negotiating lower prices, according to disclosure records compiled by PoliticalMoneyLine, a nonpartisan group that tracks money in politics. She also worked to curb class-action lawsuits; Wyeth has set aside more than $21 billion to pay claims that its diet drugs caused heart and lung complications in patients.
Both measures, which were strongly backed by DeLay, are now law. Hirschmann declined to comment on her activities on behalf of the company; Wyeth had no immediate comment.
DeLay, 57, an 11-term congressman, also sought over Senate opposition legislation to protect oil companies from being sued for using MTBE, a gasoline additive that was found to contaminate groundwater.
Altria and Reynolds
When the Senate voted in 2004 to link a multimillion-dollar buyout of tobacco farmers with a provision allowing the Food and Drug Administration to regulate the industry, DeLay objected, saying it was an attempt to ban tobacco through a "back-door regulatory process." The Senate agreed to drop the FDA provision.
And on and on and on.
Posted on April 6, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
More Trouble for Tom DeLay
Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's troubles show no sign of ending any time soon. The New York Times reports on further information that has come to light about Mr. DeLay's fundraising and lobbying activities.
The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas.
Although several members of Congress employ family members as campaign managers or on their political action committees, advocacy groups seeking an overhaul of federal campaign-finance and ethics laws say that the payments to Mr. DeLay's family members were unusually generous, and should be the focus of new scrutiny of the Texas congressman.
Mr. DeLay, whose position as majority leader makes him the second-most-powerful House member, has offered a vigorous public defense in recent weeks to a flurry of ethics accusations from Democratic lawmakers and campaign watchdog groups, including charges that he violated House rules on travel. The executive director of Americans for a Republican Majority and a major fund-raiser for the committee were indicted in Texas last year on charges of illegal fund-raising, and prosecutors there have refused to rule out the possibility of charges against Mr. DeLay in the continuing inquiry.
In recent weeks, public interest groups have called on the House ethics committee and the Justice Department to review lavish, privately financed overseas trips for Mr. DeLay and his aides, including a 1997 trip to Russia that was underwritten by a conservative education group closely linked to a powerful Republican lobbyist who often boasted of his influence with the majority leader.
DeLay's poll numbers in his home district appear to be in a freefall after his grandstanding in the Terry Schiavo case, and his recent statements threatening to hold judges to account for their actions in the case. The fact that the so-called "activist trial judge" in the Schiavo case - Judge Greer - is a Conservative Republican Baptist apparently has yet to register with Mr. DeLay. Recent polls show that most Americans greatly disapprove of Congress' meddling in the Schiavo family's private tragedy. Add in a few more ethics violations, some shady fundraising allegations and suddenly the House Majority Leader's political future doesn't look quite so bright.
Posted on April 5, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Supreme Court Protects IRA's
In a piece of good news this morning, the Supreme Court has ruled that IRA's are protected from creditors in bankruptcy proceedings. The unanimous decision sides with a bankrupt Arkansas couple fighting to keep more than $55,000 in retirement savings. As a result, IRAs now join pensions, 401(k)s, Social Security and other benefits tied to age, illness or disability that are afforded protection under bankruptcy law.
Oh, but wait: there's a spoiler.
Under bankruptcy law, the retirement savings won't be given blanket protection. A separate provision in the law shields the assets only to the extent the money is "reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent."
And who decides whether the money is "reasonably necessary"? Well, it used to be the bankruptcy judge, but under the new bankruptcy law, look for creditors to argue that IRA money isn't necessary for the 1.6 million people who filed for personal bankruptcy last year. And who are these profligate spenders filing bankruptcy anyway? "Experts say much of that is being driven by people 55 and older who lose their jobs and cannot pay off debts."
Posted on April 4, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
American Catholics Out of Step With Vatican on Social Issues
A recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll sheds some interesting light on the attitudes of American Catholics. 78% believe Catholics should be allowed to use birth control. 63% believe that priests should be allowed to marry. 59% would like church doctrine on stem cell research to be less strict. 55% believe women should be allowed to become priests. 49% believe Catholics should be able to divorce and re-marry without getting an annulment. But only 37% of Catholics believe that church doctrine on abortion should be less strict.
These poll numbers illustrate the challenges ahead for the next pope. American Catholics are an independent lot, and donations from American churches send a sizable amount of money to the Vatican. Many dioceses are without priests at all; they have to rely on a "circuit-riding" priest who handles several parishes. If priests could marry and women could become priests this would alleviate the priest shortage, argue many American Catholics. Some also believe it would raise the standards on the kind of people seeking the priesthood and would help greatly with the church's devastating sexual abuse scandals.
But given the fact that John Paul II personally chose 100 of the cardinals who will be locked in the Sistine Chapel to elect a new pope, it seems unlikely that they will elect a liberal Catholic who thinks Vatican II was a good thing.
Posted on April 3, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
Pope John Paul II Dead at 84
Pope John Paul II passed away today at the age of 84. Of all of his many accomplishments, I believe that his ecumenical outreach and recognition of Israel as a sovereign state will be his most lasting legacies. Considered a liberal on the subjects of religious tolerance and civil rights, he was the first Pope to set foot in a mosque and a synagogue. He traveled the globe to meet Catholics from all nations and to meet with leaders of other religions. His apology for the Catholic Church's actions during the Holocaust was a bold move, not appreciated by his native Poland. He rebuked President Bush for the Iraq War and remained opposed to that war to the end and tirelessly campaigned against the death penalty. His liberalism on these issues contrasted strongly with his ultra-conservative attitudes on abortion, euthanasia, birth control, celibacy for the priesthood, homosexuality and women's role in the church. Although embraced by the third world churches, those attitudes did not sit well with many American Catholics, especially the issues of birth control and not allowing priests to marry. A linguist, he was outgoing, caring and openly affectionate: all traits which endeared him to the public.
He was a complex and devout man who changed the Office of the Holy See in profound ways. May he rest in peace.
Posted on April 2, 2005
Permanent link to this entry.
| |
|
Our Blogs
Bloggers Blog
Book Blog
Crafters Craft
Drivers Drive
Fantasy SF Blog
Gamers Game
Health News Blog
HowToWeb.com
The IWJ Blog
Lovers Love
Media Cynic
Petosphere
Pleasant Morning Buzz
Science News Blog
Shopping Blog
Singers Sing
Surfers Surf
Traders Trade
Video Nacho
Watchers Watch
Workers Work
The Write News
Writer's Blog
|